Will the Wolves Be Exterminated Again?
On Thursday, July 29th, the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of
Appeals in Denver, Colorado, began hearing the arguments in the appeal
of the Farm Bureau vs. the wolves trial. A panel of three judges will
determine whether to let stand or reverse the 1997 ruling by U.S.
District Judge William Downes of Wyoming. Downes found in favor of the
American Farm Bureau and ruled that the wolves reintroduced to
Yellowstone National Park would have to be removed.
In 1995 the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service began the
Yellowstone wolf reintroduction program after many years of planning.
Sixty-six Canadian grey wolves were released in the greater Yellowstone
and central Idaho areas. The program was successful in several important
ways. The wolves have thrived and increased their numbers to slightly
over three hundred. Scientists say that the ecological balance of that
region is being restored due to the presence of the wolves. Elk and deer
populations are being managed naturally and many species of scavengers
from birds to beetles are benefiting from the left-overs of wolf kills.
Judge Downes' decision to remove the wolves amounts to a
death sentence for them if it is not reversed. The Canadian government
has made it clear that they will not take the wolves and US zoos have
stated that they have all the wolves they need and will not take any
more. Even if a place could be found to send the wolves, the chances are
slim that they would survive once removed from the Yellowstone
wilderness.
Hopefully the three judge panel of the 10th U.S. Circuit
Court of Appeals will not bow to the interests of the cattle slavers who
express concerns that wolves will eat into their profits. Wolves rarely
attack cattle and when they have, federal agents have destroyed them.
The animal protection group Defenders of Wildlife manage a compensation
fund and during the last decade have paid ranchers the fair market value
for any livestock killed or injured by wolves. Many more cattle die from
eating toxic plants, from blizzards, from bad management than are killed
by wolves. The Greater Yellowstone Coalition has stated that "only one
out of every 25,000 livestock losses in Montana are due to wolves;
domestic dogs kill 200 times more livestock than wolves in Montana".
Not long ago a wolf pair ventured south of Yellowstone
to the Grand Teton National Park where they had five pups. The male was
killed by a vehicle on a park road in late June. Now the female is
raising the pups alone and is faced with a great temptation. Grand Teton
Park superintendent Jack Neckels granted a permit to a rancher to bring
close to a thousand cow-calf pairs into the park to graze, within a
couple of miles of the wolf den. If the female preys on any of these
cattle she will be destroyed. Three groups, the Greater Yellowstone
Coalition, Jackson Hole Conservation Alliance and Predator Project have
given formal notice that they will file a lawsuit in 60 days if these
wolves do not receive the protection required by the endangered species
act.
Wildlife should be granted first use of our national
parks and forests, not cattle. It is long past time for reform of our
nation's grazing policies. The vast majority of people in our country
want the wolf reintroduction program to work and the cattle slavers
should learn to live with that. It is ironic that the greatest threat to
wolves in the wild would turn out to be the cow.
Animal Rights Online will continue to follow these
cases, but decisions may not come for months. In the meantime you can
remember that our food choices determine the fate of the wolves and the
bison and the rest of the remaining wildlife. Go Vegan.
For more information about the earlier trial and on the
wolves of Yellowstone visit these sites�
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
http://www.defenders.org/
Greater Yellowstone Coalition
http://www.greateryellowstone.org/
Ralph Maughan's wolf report
http://www.poky.srv.net/~jjmrm/
Go on to My Shadow
Return to 1 August 1999 Issue
Return to Newsletters
** Fair Use Notice**
This document may contain copyrighted material, use of which has not been
specifically authorized by the copyright owners. I believe that this
not-for-profit, educational use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the
copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright
Law). If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your
own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright
owner.
