Craig Cline, Salem, Oregon
February 2014
Now let’s take a big step forward, as “humane humans,” and let ourselves see that the word “others” as used in the dictionary definition of The Golden Rule can and should include ALL members of what we call the animal kingdom, scientifically known as Animalia, and not just the human component of that kingdom.
As adults, we are typically concerned with what we call “human rights.”
We consider ourselves to be humanitarians because we willingly deal with the
needs of mankind in general and the alleviation of human suffering in
particular.
Interestingly, the word “humane” is derived from the root word human.
When we act humanely, we are seen as having the good qualities of humans,
such as compassion, kindness, benevolence, and mercy.
In an ideal world, each of us humans is humane -- and collectively, all of
humanity exhibits the qualities that flow out of the word humane.
The Golden Rule comes to mind, whereby we are taught that we should behave
towards others as we would have others behave towards us.
Notice that the word “others” is commonly taken to mean other humans --
other
people -- regardless of their color, creed, religion, national origin, and
so on.
In examining that word, we note that others are likely to be of a different
character or quality from ourselves. However, their difference from us
does not mean that we are entitled to treat them differently from how we
ourselves expect to be treated, in accordance with The Golden Rule.
Now let’s take a big step forward, as “humane humans,” and let ourselves see
that the word “others” as used in the dictionary definition of The Golden
Rule can
and should include ALL members of what we call the animal kingdom,
scientifically known as Animalia, and not just the human component of that
kingdom.
Common sense alone holds that animals would -- if they only could -- ask us
humans not to make them the victims of human-imposed cruelty, abuse, pain,
suffering, and premature death.
Logic also holds that since we humans would not ourselves willingly suffer
any such human-imposed afflictions, we therefore ought not impose them upon
non-humans. If we do, whether we abuse animals directly or indirectly,
we are violating the very spirit of The Golden Rule.
Sadly, so far in human history at least, even religious people have leaned
on the presumption that “Man” has dominion over the animals -- that we can
control them, and by extension, treat them however we choose, no matter how
much we besmirch The Golden Rule in so doing.
We “humane humans” ought not be a part of that process, either directly or
indirectly. The fact is, we do not have to be part of it; we can
instead choose to abandon it. We can follow the essence of our own
conscience and apply The Golden Rule to all creatures great and small in our
human interactions with them.
Among the people who have most broadly expanded their moral horizons are
those who have become vegans. These humane humans live by The Golden
Rule every day.
Think about it. Would YOU like to be a so-called “food animal”?
Because your answer is doubtless an emphatic “NO,” may I ask that you
reflect on a mightily meaningful quote by the renowned animal issues
activist, Henry Spira: “If you see something that’s wrong, you’ve got
to do something about it.”
We humans are the most powerful members of the animal kingdom. Let us
unite in both seeing “animal wrongs” and in acting to DO SOMETHING about
them. Let’s become vegans and apply our Golden Rule to ALL animals,
humans and non-humans alike.
This article was written by Craig Cline of Salem, Oregon, an animal issues advocate who is continuing to evolve toward becoming a “Humaneitarian” and helping to right “animal wrongs” as part of that evolution.
Return to: Animals: Tradition, Philosophy, Religion