The Revelator
December 2017
The disappearance of a tiny oceanic parasite, researchers warn, indicates that overfishing has caused an ecosystem to fall out of balance.
A lot can change in five decades.
In 1963 University of Aberdeen researcher Ken MacKenzie published a paper
about a parasite called Stichocotyle nephropis living in the waters around
Scotland.
Last month he came full circle, publishing a new paper in the journal
Fisheries Research describing the tiny flatworm’s possible extinction due to
overfishing of its host species.
“Stichocotyle was the subject of the first paper I ever published in 1963
and it is a sobering thought that it has probably disappeared in my
lifetime,” he says. He adds that he regrets never photographing the species
while he was working on it in the 1960s, although he did provide this
drawing from an earlier paper:
The species — like most parasites — spent its life in different
hosts depending on its life stages. According to MacKenzie’s new paper,
Stichocotyle’s larval form lived in the bodies of Norway lobsters (Nephrops
norvegicus). In its adult form — a worm reaching about 4 inches in length —
it could be found in the bile ducts of the thornback ray (Raja clavata). It
was also observed one time in the barndoor skate (Dipturus laevis).
Neither the ray nor the skate are commercially fished, but they are
frequently killed as bycatch, enough so that they are considered
near-threatened and endangered, respectively.
According to the paper, it’s the overfishing of these two species that may
have caused the parasite’s extinction because there now aren’t enough of the
animals to host the adult parasites.
The reports of this extinction have been a long time coming. Stichocotyle
was last seen in 1986, and attempts to locate it since then have proven
fruitless. “I was initially surprised when I went to look for specimens in
2001 in areas where I knew it to have been common in the 1960s and I failed
to find it,” MacKenzie says. More recently he and his co-author examined
more than 1,200 Norway lobsters and found no signs of infection. Similar
inspections of thornback rays did not turn up any signs of the parasite.
This doesn’t mean the species is definitely extinct, but the prospects don’t
look good. The host rays have been seriously overfished and its populations
have become disconnected, so there is little opportunity for the parasite’s
larvae — if they still exist — to be transmitted from lobsters to the rays.
According MacKenzie additional populations of Stichocotyle could still
survive, but only in isolated pockets with few opportunities for
propagation. “We would love to be proved wrong about Stichocotyle now being
extinct and we hope that parasitologists in other areas will now search for
it,” he says.
So why should we care about the extinction of a tiny parasite? For one
thing, it was the only known member of its taxonomic order, meaning an
entire evolutionary line has possibly been lost.
Beyond that, we don’t know exactly what role Stichocotyle played in its
ecosystem, but MacKenzie points out that its very existence was an important
sign. “Parasites can be good indicators of the health of an ecosystem,” he
says. “It is said that a healthy ecosystem has a healthy parasite fauna.”
The loss of this parasite, therefore, indicates an ecosystem pushed out of
balance by human activity.
Meanwhile, Stichocotyle may not be a lone example. Earlier this year a paper
published in Science Advances warned that climate change could cause
one-third of the world’s parasites to go extinct by the year 2070.
MacKenzie himself has seen evidence of this. “I have some indications of
local parasite extinctions, but not enough evidence yet to publish anything.
I have been retired from full-time work since 1995 but I continue to pursue
my interests as an honorary member of staff of the University of Aberdeen. I
hope that younger workers, such as my co-author Campbell Pert, will continue
to monitor parasites as indicators of the health of marine ecosystems.”
In other words, keep checking those lobsters. Our oceans could need what’s
inside them.
Return to Fishes