Katherine Roe, Ph.D., Laboratory Investigations Department,
People for the Ethical
Treatment of Animals (PETA)
September 2014
Moreover, after consulting numerous experts in the fields of anthropology, primatology, medicine, and mental health, we conclude that given the harm caused to animals, the experiments’ limited relevance to humans, the substantial financial cost, and the existence of superior nonanimal research methods that the continued use of animals in this work is scientifically and ethically unjustifiable.
This document provides a critical scientific review and assessment of
continuing maternal
deprivation and psychopathology studies on nonhuman primates conducted
within the National
Institutes of Health (NIH) Intramural Research Program. A careful analysis
of Animal Study
Proposals, Board of Scientific Counselors reviews, scientific publications,
photographs, and videos
related to these projects casts doubt on the worth of these experiments in
light of advancements in the
field, and offers several examples of human-based studies that successfully
address precisely the
questions asked by these NIH investigators. Moreover, after consulting
numerous experts in the
fields of anthropology, primatology, medicine, and mental health, we
conclude that given the harm caused to animals, the experiments’ limited relevance to humans, the
substantial financial cost, and the existence of superior nonanimal research methods that the continued
use of animals in
this work is scientifically and ethically unjustifiable.
For the entire report,
read the PDF.
Return to Maternal Deprivation Experiments