Michael Winship, Truthout
January 2010
Scientists believe climate change -- the warming of oceans -- has allowed some of the almost 2,000 jellyfish species to expand their ranges, appear earlier in the year and increase overall numbers, much as warming has helped ticks, bark beetles and other pests to spread to new latitudes.
There are certain newspaper headlines that catch your eye and stop you in
your tracks. Like the New York Post's famous "Headless Body in Topless Bar."
Or such tabloid greats as "Evil Cows Ate My Garden," "Double Decker Bus
Found on Moon," and my personal favorite, "Proof of Reincarnation: Baby Born
with Wooden Leg."
Along similar lines, I was startled this week when London's Daily Mail
published an article headlined, "Could we be in for 30 years of global
COOLING?" Triggered by the unusual cold and snow in the United Kingdom over
the last few weeks, the article began, "Britain's big freeze is the start of
a worldwide trend towards colder weather that seriously challenges global
warming theories, eminent scientists claimed yesterday."
The story went on to reference various researchers and their institutions,
including the National Snow and Ice Data Center at the University of
Colorado in Boulder, which reported, according to the Mail, that, "The
warming of the Earth since 1900 is due to natural oceanic cycles, and not
man-made greenhouse gases."
This was followed by an article on the Fox News Web site with the headline,
"30 Years of Global Cooling Are Coming, Leading Scientist Says."
There are only two small problems, as was pointed out by Steve Benen on
Washington Monthly magazine's "Political Animal" blog: "First, the National
Snow and Ice Data Center said no such thing. The director of the NSIDC said,
'This is completely false. NSIDC has never made such a statement and we were
never contacted by anyone from the Daily Mail.'" (Subsequently, both Fox and
the Mail removed the reference to the NSIDC in their articles.)
Second, as proof of global cooling, both stories cited research conducted by
Mojib Latif, a prominent climate modeler with the UN's Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change. Latif's response to their reporting? "I don't know
what to do," he said. "They just make these things up."
Latif's work on climatology is complex and often difficult to understand,
which is why the Fox and Daily Mail reporters may have his story mixed up --
it wouldn't be the first time journalists have been confused by his
findings. But as cogently interpreted by the physicist and climate expert
Dr. Joseph Romm of the liberal Center for American Progress, "Latif has NOT
predicted a cooling trend -- or a 'decades-long deep freeze' -- but rather a
short-time span where human-caused warming might be partly offset by ocean
cycles, staying at current record levels, but then followed by 'accelerated'
warming where you catch up to the long-term human-caused trend. He does NOT
forecast 2 or 3 decades of cooling."
In fact, as Latif told the British newspaper the Guardian, "I believe in
manmade global warming... There is no doubt within the scientific community
that we are affecting the climate, that the climate is changing and
responding to our emissions of greenhouse gases."
And if you don't believe him, ask the jellyfish.
Jellyfish don't lie. Well, sometimes they lie -- deceased and desiccated
along the beach, which from strolling along various Eastern Seaboard shores
is about the extent of my knowledge of them. That, and that Ogden Nash
couplet, the one that goes, "Who wants my jellyfish? I am not sellyfish!"
But according to the Associated Press, the jellyfish population is rising.
The news service reports, "Scientists believe climate change -- the warming
of oceans -- has allowed some of the almost 2,000 jellyfish species to
expand their ranges, appear earlier in the year and increase overall
numbers, much as warming has helped ticks, bark beetles and other pests to
spread to new latitudes."
This has led to all manner of consequences, some you would expect, others
not. A 2008 National Science Foundation study found populations growing
along the East Coast -- in the Chesapeake Bay area, people are stung about
half a million times a year. In the Middle East and Africa, swarms have
jammed hydroelectric and desalination plants, forcing them to shut down. In
Japan, the fishing industry is losing up to $332 million a year because
jellyfish swarms fill the nets, crowding out mackerel, sea bass and other
fish.
The AP reports that in October, off the eastern coast of Japan,
"Jelly-filled nets capsized a 10-ton trawler as its crew tried to pull them
up. The three fishermen were rescued." I know this all sounds like something
out of a Godzilla movie, but it's serious stuff.
And speaking of jellyfish, here's a headline you may not see anytime soon:
"Senate Passes Sweeping Climate Bill."
Although in a January 14 speech to the Energy Finance Forum, Senate Majority
Leader Harry Reid said, "Taking on the clean-energy challenge... may be the
most important policy we will ever pass. And we cannot afford to wait any
longer to act," the cap-and-trade climate bill that narrowly passed the
House of Representatives back in June malingers in the purgatory of the
Senate.
And next week, Senator Reid will allow a vote on an amendment to the
legislation lifting the Federal debt ceiling. Proposed by Alaska Republican
Senator Lisa Murkowski, it would block the enforcement funding of the
Environmental Protection Agency, giving free rein to the coal industry and
other big polluters to ignore the Clean Air Act.
The activist group Credo Action, part of the company Working Assets, warns,
"You would think this would be easy to stop, but the vote is predicted to be
close with many Democrats considering voting for the bill... The coal
industry has been working furiously to close deals with senators across the
political spectrum, including those who say they want to protect the
environment."
Return to Environmental Articles