Vegan lifestyle articles that discuss ways of living in peace with humans, animals, and the environment.
Underpinned by the decision to stop the deep injustice of creating victims, no checklist is needed to determine which species deserve to be respected; it’s ALL of them. This is what veganism actually is and once an individual has acknowledged that this is their choice, it is unshakeable.
Image by TraslosMuros.com / Aitor Garmendia
Recently I saw a comment that ‘most people define veganism as the same as a plant based diet‘, before they went on to say, ‘Why does it matter? If people go vegan for health or environment it’s still good for animals too.’ So is that true?
The vegan believes that if we are to be true emancipators of animals we
must renounce absolutely our traditional and conceited attitude that we have
the right to use them to serve our needs. We must supply these needs by
other means. If the vegan ideal of non-exploitation were generally adopted,
it would be the greatest peaceful revolution ever known, abolishing vast
industries and establishing new ones in the better interests of men and
animals alike.
~ Donald Watson (2 September 1910 – 16 November 2005), who coined the word
vegan
The first thing that needs to be stressed is that veganism isn’t a fad
diet, it isn’t a health kick, it isn’t an environmental stategy. It’s a
moral decision, taken on an individual basis, to stop using other beings for
any and all reasons. Veganism is a rejection of all use of other animals to
serve our interests. That’s not a ‘matter of opinion’ as I’ve seen the
uninformed claim. It’s the actual definition. It’s what it is.
So veganism is an acknowledgement of our kinship with the other species with
whom we share a planet; it’s a decision to stop the deep injustice of making
victims out of them, and it’s made out of respect for those victims. One of
the consequences of that decision is to stop using their bodies for food,
but it equally impacts on a decision to avoid substances and services that
use their lives and bodies in other ways too. The food vegans eat is often
referred to as a ‘vegan diet’ but in fact it is a plant diet and to eat that
way is only one manifestation of the single decision to stop using others.
So when we hear about ‘going vegan for health’ or ‘going vegan for the
environment’ it illustrates that many people don’t understand what veganism
actually is. Quite understandably, and possibly because they don’t know what
veganism is, they fail to see that it could be a problem as long as animals
are not being eaten. So I have been wondering if they could possibly be
right, that the net result actually IS the same regardless of motive.
But in the end I decided that I do consider it a problem. And my view has
nothing to do with ‘personal purity’ or ‘policing’ or ‘being more vegan than
someone else’ or any of the ridiculous accusations that tend to fly; it’s
based on a lifetime of knowledge and a deep understanding of how our
behaviours as humans can be swayed and affected by the motives behind them.
So let’s clarify what is actually meant by ‘going vegan for health’ or
‘going vegan for the environment’; we clearly know what is meant even
though, as I’ve said, they are inaccurate terms in themselves.
Note
Now before I go on I’d like to get something out of the way because I’ve
been doing this long enough to anticipate irate comments brewing. I know of
many people who made the decision to adopt plant diets or change the range
of species that they chose to use, for various reasons not necessarily
connected with other animals. Many of these people subsequently did make the
decision to become vegan and all are glad to have done so. For them, their
intitial motivation gave way to a true vegan ethic but it would be wrong to
claim that the progression was automatic. In almost every case , some
additional information, along with vegan education, provoked the shift.
As an advocate on behalf of the trillions of annual victims of my species, I
will not sell them out by promoting anything less than being vegan for our
victims. They are depending on every one of us; they have no one but us, and
they are queueing in the slaughterhouses as I type.
‘Vegan for health’
‘Going vegan for health’ is used to mean that someone has opted to change
their diet to a plant based one because they quite understandably consider
that it will improve their health. For whom is this change made? Naturally
it’s for the person who wishes their health to be improved; they adopt a
diet.
Now given that it’s a diet, several things common to all diets will apply.
We all cheat on diets. Go on, tell me you’ve never cheated on a diet and I
won’t believe you.
Another phenomenon with diets (Atkins, Keto etc) is seen when media hype
either renounces the whole thing, or claims certain aspects of the diet are
unhealthy/need supplementation etc. Do we consider changing? Well again,
because the reason for the diet is our own health, that’s our priority and
it’s very likely we’d follow recommendations / change or stop.
Now given the fact that the animal use industries continuously advertise in
ways that mandaciously suggest health and wellbeing both of victims and
consumers, as well as paying to produce skewed ‘science’ in their attempts
to safeguard their vile trade – it doesn’t take much figuring out to see
where someone for whom health is their priority may be tempted. These
industries and their ‘farming’ suppliers have for decades got away with the
most outrageous lies about the necessity for our health of the horror show
that they make vast sums of money from. They make it in sales and in
subsidies and they have massive budgets to continue their propaganada
machine as well as the clout to influence political and health policies and
decisions.
In fact this ‘health centred’ route is the one travelled by so many who
proclaim themselves ‘ex-vegans’. And the alacrity with which ‘anti-vegan /
pro animal use’ sensationalist media picks up and publicises such stories is
surely well known to us all. The claims made by these alleged ‘ex vegans’
about their need to reintroduce animal bodies to their diets invariably stem
from flawed advice and nutritional misunderstandings but that’s not a
subject for this essay. The fact is, when motivated by our own health, we
can be much more easily swayed by the skillful propaganda being aimed so
unscrupulously at those like us by industries that want our cash at any
price.
‘Vegan for the environment’
So how about ‘vegan for the environment’? This is taken to mean a decision
to adopt a plant diet in the face of almost overwhelming scientific
consensus that animal agriculture is a pivotal driver of the climate
emergency that is threatening to deprive our children of a future, and in
fact will ultimately cause our own extinction as a species. That choice is
arguably less self-centred than a similar one made for reasons of personal
health but it is still unquestionably human-centred.
Debates are raging – and will continue to do so because so few are willing
to accept their own personal role in the problem – but it is deeply
disheartening to see how many articles continue to focus the blame for the
current crisis on corporations and governments, refusing wilfully to pick up
on the elephant in the room. That elephant? This time, it’s animal
agriculture, its impact on the planet, the subsidies it continues to
attract, and the fact that it is at heart a demand-driven system. Ideally,
as an animal rights advocate, I envision that as consumer demand for animal
use diminishes through individuals making the decision to opt out of the
brutal regime of oppression, governments can finally be pressed to accept
the deep immorality of continuing to subsidise a failing industry that is
killing the planet.
However meanwhile there’s an unseemly rush in evidence, opportunists seeing
the money-making potential of developing scientific and technological means
to tackle the mammoth task of planetary cooling and the removal of
greenhouse gases from the atmosphere while minimising or even avoiding (!)
any fundamental change in our destructive behaviour as a species. Can they
do it at all? Can they do it in time? I doubt it, personally. With estimates
ranging from 5-12 years before the whole planetary collapse becomes
irretreivable, I just can’t see it happening. But if a miracle were to
happen and it did, what then?
Well I would bet my boots that once the heat was off (pun intended), ‘vegan
for the environment’ would no longer be seen as imperative and like the
‘vegan for health’ motive, adherents of such diets may see no harm in
indulging themselves on the dead flesh, breastmilk and eggs of other
creatures once again.
Not a diet
My final point on the two dietary options that I’ve talked about here, is
that – wait for it – veganism is not a diet. As well as refusing to consume
substances derived from the bodies of other creatures, where it is at all
possible, vegans make appropriate choices in terms of all other goods and
services including toiletries, cleaning materials, clothing, entertainment
etc.
Underpinned by the decision to stop the deep injustice of creating victims,
no checklist is needed to determine which species deserve to be respected;
it’s ALL of them. This is what veganism actually is and once an individual
has acknowledged that this is their choice, it is unshakeable. It becomes
completely unthinkable to even consider going back on that decision; it
becomes an integral part, even the defining part of who we are as
individuals.
And that is why I so desperately hope that the commenter is wrong about
‘most people’ thinking in terms of diet, because if they are not, then there
is only one group that will lose out by it, as they do every time. That
group is our victims; for whom any reprieve as a result of human-centred and
self interested motives can be only temporary.
Only on the day they take centre stage and are recognised as individuals
with the right to be free of our violence and persecution, owning their
bodies and living their lives, will their years of oppression end.
So be VEGAN for them.
Return to Articles Reflecting a Vegan Lifestyle