From Genesis to Revelation, and from the early church to the present day, there are vivid examples of God's—and the church's—love of, care for, and delight in animal creatures.
[This piece appears in Evangelical Theologies of Liberation and Justice, edited by Mae Elise Cannon and Andrea Smith and appears here with permission. Copyright (c) 2019 by Mae Elise Cannon and Andrea Smith. Published by InterVarsity Press, Downers Grove, IL.]
Evangelical Theologies of Liberation and Justice
From Genesis to Revelation, and from the early church to the present day,
there are vivid examples of God's—and the church's—love of, care for, and
delight in animal creatures. William Wilberforce and other leaders of the
British antislavery and anti–child labor movements were also early founders
of the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, and worked to
pass legislation protecting animals from various forms of cruelty.
Many accounts from the lives of saints include moving tales of meaningful
friendships between saints and animals, such as the story of St. Macarius,
who healed a blind hyena pup: the pup's mother tried to repay Macarius's
kindness by bringing him a sheep's skin. As the story goes, Macarius took
the skin, but only after insisting that if the hyena was hungry, she was not
to kill another creature, but should come to him for food, which she did.
Today, many churches include food for companion animals in their food pantry
programs. Others take special care to protect and provide for wildlife who
wish to make a home on church grounds. Christian college students take
internships at animal welfare organizations and ask their campus dining
halls to provide vegan and vegetarian food options. Some pastors publicly
support legislation that promotes better animal welfare, preside over pet
funerals, or preach on topics that include concern for animals. Church
animal welfare groups hold film screenings, book discussions, and small
group studies to promote dialogue about Christianity and animal welfare in
their congregations.
There are many ways to care for animals, and Jesus
followers are often moved to do so not in spite of their faith, but because
of it. Of course, human beings are a kind of animal creature, different from
sibling species by a matter of physiological and genetic degrees. But for
our purposes, I refer to human beings as "humans" and nonhuman beings as
"animals."
A reading of the Scripture that is attentive to animals shows that humans
and animals are both created by God, worship God, and are provided for by
God; humans are made in the image of God and given a particular role in that
image; the whole (broken) world is in the process of being reconciled to God
through Jesus Christ; and the vision of the promised kingdom is marked by
peace between and flourishing of all species.
Humans are made in the image of God
While the creation narrative in Genesis 2 portrays animals as potential
partners to humans, in Genesis 1, God says, "Let us make mankind in our
image, in likeness" (Gen 1:26). In English translations, Christ is also
referred to as the image of God: "The Son is the image of the invisible God,
the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things
in heaven and on earth" (Col 1:15‑16). Humans have not always lived up to
the image endowed by the Creator in us. Eleazar S. Fernandez posits one
possible source of this failure:
We have learned to develop our identities as human beings through disconnection, rather than through connectedness and interdependence. Our way of relating to fellow human beings parallels our way of relating to other beings in the cosmos. We seek to disconnect ourselves because we want to establish our difference from other forms of life. But the difference that we seek through our acts of disconnection is an adjunct to claim our superiority. We establish our difference through disconnection because we believe deep in our hearts that it is only in disconnecting ourselves that we can claim superiority. Rather than seeing our difference and uniqueness as a reminder of our interdependence, we confuse our difference and uniqueness with superiority.
When we downplay the kinship between animals and humans portrayed in Genesis
2 and center ourselves in the story of the creation and redemption of the
world (anthropocentrism), there are far-reaching consequences not only for
our relationship with animals and the environment, but for our relationships
with other humans as well. Liberation ethicist and pastor Christopher Carter
asks us to consider whether humans are "living up to their potential as
beings created in the image of God? Are they capable of re-imagining their
divinely appointed role in Creation to care for nonhuman animals in a way
that conforms to this image?"
Humans are given a particular role in that image
Immediately after creating and blessing humans, God tells these beings made
in the image of their Creator that they are to "rule over the fish in the
sea and the birds in the sky and over every living creature that moves on
the earth" (Gen 1:28). And right away, God points to the lush landscape and
says, "I give you every seed-bearing plant on the face of the whole earth
and every tree that has fruit with seed in it. They will be yours for food"
(Gen 1:29). Our first responsibility was to cultivate the plants of the land
so that all God's creatures could eat. Even as the Scriptures describe sin
and its consequences, including the reality of food from animal and human
death, God placed limits on human use and consumption of animals, outlined
in the Law. Working animals were to be given weekly rest (Ex 23:12); fields
were to lie fallow, in part to allow wild animals the opportunity to eat (Ex
23:10); and it was a sin to kill an animal without giving appropriate thanks
to God (Lev 17:3‑7).
When humans fail to obey God, the whole world suffers (Gen 7–8); when humans
fail to keep God at the center of their lives, the whole world suffers (Jer
7:16‑20; 12:4).