"I can’t say it more clearly: When you pay to pet, hold or take a picture with a captive wild animal, you are supporting animal abuse."

Tiger King Netflix ad...
By now, most people have watched or heard of the Netflix docuseries
Tiger King, which shines a light on roadside zoos and the captive
wildlife trade – but there's far more to the story. The insidious
business of using big cats for entertainment causes a lifetime of
untold misery.
I can’t say it more clearly: When you pay to pet, hold or take a
picture with a captive wild animal, you are supporting animal abuse.
When you patronize a county fair that features a captive big cat or
bear show or any other wild animal attraction, you are supporting
animal abuse. When you go to a circus with wild animal acts, you are
supporting animal abuse. When you pay to have captive wild animals
at a birthday party or corporate event, you are supporting animal
abuse. All these activities involve subjecting animals to close
confinement, unnatural living conditions, stressful situations, and
often, cruel training. They also sustain the unchecked breeding and
sale of captive wildlife.
Don’t be fooled. Places that sell you the opportunity to hold a
tiger cub, pet a sloth, or that use captive wildlife for
entertainment are not helping to conserve animals in the wild and
they most definitely are sending the wrong message about animals.
These are not "educational" events. They are strictly entertainment
experiences presented by the same individuals and enterprises that
provide wild animals for fairs, parties, television talk shows, and
film productions.
Getting up close and personal does not benefit the animals. At PAWS,
we strive to ensure that our animals have the most natural,
intrusion-free lives possible, therefore, we are not open to the
public except for a limited number of educational events at ARK
2000. PAWS is a true sanctuary, meaning that we do not buy, sell,
breed, or allow the public to come into contact with the animals.
Our focus is on the individual for the sake of that animal only.
They are not ambassadors for their species nor are they on display
to send a message. If there is any message, it is that the
situations these animals were rescued from, and the abuse and
deprivations many of them suffered, should not be allowed to exist.
The rampant breeding of big cats causes incredible suffering. Here
are some of the important points you should know:
Disreputable exhibitors don’t care about genetics or animal health. They recklessly breed animals, which results in physical abnormalities, neurological defects, and other lifelong health conditions. This is especially evident in “novelty” animals such as white tigers, who are highly inbred and have absolutely no conservation value, and lion-tiger crossbreeds like tigons and ligers.

Mungar, our rescued 14-year-old tiger, was born with multiple
physical problems that most likely resulted from inbreeding. His
challenges are many: Mungar is blind in his left eye and has limited
vision in his right. Malformed neck vertebrae pinch his spinal cord,
causing urinary incontinence and making it difficult to coordinate
his rear legs. He also has a deformed jaw so chewing large pieces of
food is a challenge. He requires multiple medications and
specialized care. Despite all this, Mungar is a content and playful
tiger, and he is beloved by our caregiving staff.
Many people are asking how the mistreatment of captive big cats can
be allowed in this country. Unfortunately, the federal Animal
Welfare Act (AWA) is outdated and very vague, enabling rundown zoos,
cub petting schemes, and bear pits to legally operate. The U.S.
Department of Agriculture, the agency charged with enforcing the
AWA, has increasingly treated exhibitors as clients rather than
entities to be regulated and held accountable for their animals’
health and welfare.
The late Pat Derby and I long called on zoos to take a stand against
circuses and the private ownership of exotic animals. I’d like to
think that if we had all pulled together, we could have already
ended the abuse you see in Tiger King. While I commend the
Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) for supporting the Big Cat
Public Safety Act, zoos can do more for captive wildlife.
Unfortunately, many AZA accredited zoos offer some type of animal
“encounter” – from camel rides and selfies with sloths, to petting
hippos and rhinos, and presentations where the public is in close
proximity to leashed wild cats such as cheetahs and servals – to
bring in additional revenue. But to the public, an animal encounter
is an animal encounter, blurring the line between AZA-accredited and
roadside zoos.
This would be a good time for respectable zoos to draw a clearer
distinction between themselves and facilities that exploit wild
animals for profit. One way is to permanently ban up-close animal
encounters (which a two-year zoo study found did not increase
visitor engagement). The recent discovery of COVID-19 in a tiger at
the Bronx Zoo makes this action all the more urgent in order to
protect animal health and welfare. The AZA should also firmly
distance itself from the Zoological Association of America (ZAA),
which promotes public contact with and the private ownership of wild
animals and accredits zoos that offer cub petting. Finally, zoos
must stop breeding animals just to produce crowd-attracting babies,
and end breeding programs for species that have no hope of
reintroduction to the wild (zoos can support special breeding
efforts and other conservation imperatives in range countries).
There is a staggering number of captive tigers and other wild cats
in the U.S., with as many as 5,000 tigers (more than exist in the
wild). When this data is extrapolated to include all big cat
species, the number can potentially be far higher. Few options exist
for placement of big cats who are victims of this breeding crisis.
(AZA accredited zoos generally will not accept big cats due to the
animals’ unknown genetic histories.) Inevitably, legitimate captive
wildlife sanctuaries are on the receiving end of the problem.
However, sanctuaries are often at capacity or unable to take on the
financial obligation of caring for more animals.
Providing lifetime care for captive big cats and other wild animals
is extremely expensive, especially as many of those animals arrive
with health conditions that require specialized care and costly
medications. PAWS continues to care for the remaining aging tigers
from our 2004 rescue of 39 sick and starving cats from a facility
that once offered tours to the public and photos with tiger cubs.
The cost to date is estimated at more than $3.75 million for
housing, food, staff, and veterinary care.
In short, we can’t rescue our way out of the big cat breeding
crisis. We have to stop the problem at its source. To do that, we
need your help. Here are some simple actions you can take:
As always, thank you for supporting PAWS.