Illegal Alaska Grizzly Bear Shoot Results in $5,000 Fine for Anchorage Man
December 13, 2011
By Craig Medred, AlaskaDispatch.com
Illegal grizzly bear shooting will cost Anchorage man dearly
A resident of Anchorage's Bear Valley who shot a grizzly bear sow in
the back, killed her and orphaned three cubs has abandoned the claim he
was acting in self-defense and pleaded guilty to illegal hunting. The
cubs are now behind bars at the Detroit Zoo. Brian Garst, 24, will avoid
a similar fate so long as he commits no further hunting or fishing
violations and pays the state of Alaska $3,800 in fines and restitution.
District Court Judge Paul Olsen on Tuesday sentenced Garst to 30 days
in jail and a fine of $5,000, but then suspended all of the jail time
and half of the fine. Garst will, however, be on probation for three
years, and if he commits some other offense in that time could be hit
with the rest of the fine and the jail time for killing the mother of
Boo, Thor and Mike -- as the bears have been named in Detroit.
Garst originally claimed he shot the sow grizzly in self-defense, but
Alaska Wildlife Trooper John Cyr refused to buy that argument. It
apparently had something to do with the facts that Garst shot the bear
in the back, skinned it, kept the hide and never reported the shooting.
Alaska allows the shooting of grizzly bears in defense of life and
property, and there are dozens of bears shot in Alaska every summer
under what is commonly known as the "DLP provision" in state law.
Assistant Attorney General Andrew Peterson said that if Garth had
reported the bear as a DLP kill, the young shooter might at least have
been able to try to make a case the shooting was in self defense -- even
if he shot the animal in the back.
The grizzly was, at the time, fleeing from the house where Garst was
staying. It had a chunk of moose meat in its mouth. Garst had left the
moose meat in the yard, though he knew well that bears still regularly
roam aptly-named Bear Valley above Alaska's largest city. Some
questioned whether maybe Garst shouldn't also have been charged with
illegal bear baiting for leaving fresh meat out with bears around, and
then shooting a bear that grabbed the meat.
Instead, the state officially charged him with a single count of
hunting in a restricted management area, and Garst agreed to plead
guilty to that charge. The Anchorage Management Area is closed to
grizzly bear hunting. "We made him an offer, and he came into court and
accepted," Peterson said.
Garst pitched the judge his story that it was all a big mistake; that
he'd shot the sow by accident thinking he was shooting a large, male
bear that had been causing problems. The sentence makes it appear Judge
Olsen didn't give great weight to that argument.
When someone shoots a grizzly, keeps the hide and fails to report the
shooting, Peterson noted, the courts "basically treat it as a hunting
issue." In this case, an illegal hunting issue. Not only did Garst shoot
the bear in a closed area, he also lacked a bear tag.
Along with being ordered to pay the $2,500 in fines, Garst was also
told he owed the state $1,300 in restitution for the dead bear. Olsen
also took away Garst's hunting privileges for a year, and he had to
forfeit the hide, skill and claws of the bear.
State officials noted after the sentencing that the DLP law doesn't
allow people to simply declare open season on bears. "Alaska law allows
for the taking of bears in the defense of life or property provided that
the taking is not brought about by the improper disposal of garbage or
similar attractive nuisance and all other practicable means to protect
life and property are exhausted," Peterson noted. "A person taking a
bear in this manner must report the incident within 15 days and deliver
the hide, skull and claws to Fish and Game. The prohibition against
allowing someone to keep a bear killed in defense of life or property is
designed to incentivize people to not shoot a bear unless all other
practical means to protect life or property are exhausted."
Prosecution of Alaskans claiming DLP bear kills are rare. Sentences
for illegally shooting bears, meanwhile, are all over the place:
villagers in Bush Alaska caught shooting and dumping bears have had
their hands slapped.
Wildlife guides have in some cases been fined tens of thousands of
dollars.The requirement people skin the bear and remove its skull is a
bit of disincentive, too. Skinning a bear is a task that takes even
those skilled in the art an hour or so. On a big bear, a neophyte could
be at the task most of a day, and it can be a little messy. Bears tend
to have a lot of greasy fat just under their hides. The DLP hides
forfeited to the state are sold at auction to help raise funds for
Though some view the death of the grizzly sow as tragic, more than a
few wildlife biologists have noted the outcome for the cubs is probably
not so bad. Rarely will a sow grizzly manage to successfully raise three
cubs in the wild. Usually one or more will fall victim to another bear,
starvation or an accident. Life is a lot harder for bears in the wild
than in a zoo.
Scientists studying bears in Denali National Park and Preserve have
noted that 65 percent of the cubs born to sows there die within the
first year of life. The chances of survival get better after that, but
still another 40 percent die as yearlings. One study noted that more
than half the sows involved lost all the cubs in their litters. The sows
in that 7-year-long study gave birth to 148 cubs. Ninety nine of them
died in their first year of life. Of the 49 that survived, 20 more died
the next year.
Fair Use Notice: This document may contain copyrighted material
whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owners. We believe
that this not-for-profit, educational use on the Web constitutes
a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section
107 of the US Copyright Law). If you wish to use this copyrighted
material for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must
obtain permission from the copyright owner.