Bigotry and prejudices are rampant among 'fishermen, fisherwomen, environmentalists and biologists' about 'which species of fishes are 'worth more than others.' Said 'worth' of course based on which humans use which species of fishes for what.
Bowfin - image courtesy of Solomon David
A new study makes the case for asking anglers to reconsider which
fishes have value and are worth conserving for the good of our
ecosystems.
Pictured above: Solomon David, a biological sciences professor at
Nicholls State University, holds a bowfin.
Every year in the U.S., some 30 million anglers cast lures, flies,
and bait into freshwater streams and rivers and lakes. Their prey:
so-called game- or sportfish like black bass, chinook salmon, and
steelhead trout, which are prized for eating or for
catch-and-release photo ops among certain subsets of predominantly
white men. So much so that they are protected from overfishing by
daily bag limits that are also determined by mostly white men, who,
according to a study published in July in Fisheries Magazine,
subscribe to outdated and regressive notions of what fish are worthy
of protecting and why.
Please read the ENTIRE ARTICLE HERE (PDF)