Eating NAFTA… exposes how changes in policy following NAFTA have fundamentally altered one of the most basic elements of life in Mexico – sustenance. Mexicans face a food system that favors food security over subsistence agriculture, development over sustainability, market participation over social welfare, and ideologies of self-care over public health. Trade agreements negotiated to improve lives have sometimes failed, resulting in unintended consequences for people’s everyday lives.

The T. Colin Campbell Center for Nutrition Studies (CNS) interviewed
Alyshia Gálvez, PhD, during the 2021 Plant Forward workshop series,
which focused on regaining control of our food system. Alyshia
Gálvez is a cultural and medical anthropologist, award-winning
author, and Professor of Latin American and Latino Studies at Lehman
College of the City University of New York. In the interview, she
discussed the consequences of changing food policies, systems, and
agricultural practices in Mexico and the United States. Her focus on
trade and economic policy, and their public health implications, is
also the subject of her 2018 book, Eating NAFTA: Trade, Food
Policies, and the Destruction of Mexico (UC Press, 2018).
“Eating NAFTA… exposes how changes in policy following NAFTA have
fundamentally altered one of the most basic elements of life in
Mexico – sustenance. Mexicans face a food system that favors food
security over subsistence agriculture, development over
sustainability, market participation over social welfare, and
ideologies of self-care over public health. Trade agreements
negotiated to improve lives have sometimes failed, resulting in
unintended consequences for people’s everyday lives.” -Alyshia
Gálvez, PhD.
What is NAFTA?
The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) between Mexico, the
United States, and Canada came into force in 1994. “[It] eliminated
tariffs and barriers to trade between Mexico, the United States, and
Canada, uniting them in a single market and facilitating direct
investment and the flow of goods across borders.” A key moment in
the trend toward globalization, the beginning of NAFTA has had, “the
effect of distributing the consumption of industrial products far
and wide.” In her critique of NAFTA, Gálvez points out that the
trade agreement opened the borders to the flow of goods and capital
but did not equally liberate the flow of labor, with consequences
for the populations of all three countries.
Issues addressed:
....
Please read the ENTIRE ARTICLE HERE.