"...the perceptions’ of reptiles that underestimates
them as being unintelligent and basic in their animal welfare needs, can
mean that they suffer considerably in captivity."
—Helen Lambert, Gemma Carder, and Neil D'Cruze
"3 in 4 reptile pets die in the first year—so maybe
humans don't deserve them."
—Signe Dean

Image from American
Tortoise Rescue
I've always thought that reptiles are fascinating animals, and never
doubted that they experience a wide range of emotions and clearly should be
recognized as sentient beings. And now, a new research essay called "Given
the Cold Shoulder: A Review of the Scientific Literature for Evidence of
Reptile Sentience" by Helen Lambert, Gemma Carder, and Neil D'Cruze, shows
that a detailed analysis of available literature clearly supports this view
of these vertebrates, who are very popular pets and kept by the millions
worldwide.1 Along the lines of the above quotation from Signe Dean, Clifford
Warwick and his colleagues note that 75 percent of pet reptiles in the U.K.
die during their first year at home.2
"Given the Cold Shoulder" is available online for free, so here are a few
snippets to whet your appetite for more. The goals of this study were: (1)
to assess how reptile sentience appears in features scientific literature,
(2) to learn about how different aspects of sentience have been studied and
in the reptiles in which they are present, and (3) to outline future
research in this area.
To search for evidence of sentience in the scientific literature, Lambert
and her colleagues compiled an extensive list of 168 of keywords that were
used to refer to traits and various aspects of animal sentience. These words
are presented in their Table A1.

Number of reptile sentience papers published between 1999–2018. Source:
"Given the Cold Shoulder ," Open access
This figure clearly shows that research on reptile sentience
has increased in the past 20 years. Lambert and her colleagues found 37
studies in which it was assumed that reptiles are capable of feeling
"anxiety, stress, distress, excitement, fear, frustration, pain, and
suffering." They also found four essays in which researchers reported
evidence that reptiles are able to feel pleasure.
Clearly, these discoveries show that reptiles are far more complex than many
people realize. They also have practical implications for reptilian welfare;
it's essential to know about their emotional lives to provide them with the
best care possible—especially when they're kept in various, and often
horrific, conditions of captivity. Claims that reptiles aren't sentient and
don't experience a wide range of emotions when compared to birds and mammals
clearly are incorrect. However, many people use these misleading views to
justify keeping reptiles in tiny spaces in which they can hardly move or
stretch, with little to no stimulation.
Lambert and her colleagues conclude that reptiles are fully capable of
experiencing a range of emotions and states and that we need to use what we
know on their behalf. They write, "a better understanding [of their
emotional lives] could help to inform a range of different operational
initiatives aimed at reducing negative animal welfare impacts, including
improved husbandry and consumer behaviour change programmes."
Underestimating the emotional lives of reptiles is contrary to science. I
couldn't agree more with the researchers' conclusions. Clearly, mammalian
and avian biases regarding sentience are too narrow.
The researchers also include references that provide evidence that fishes
also experience various emotions, and there's no reason to exclude
amphibians. This information can also lessen the widespread demand for
exotic animals. In her book Do Fish Feel Pain, the late Victoria Braithwaite
argues, "I have argued that there is as much evidence that fish feel pain
and suffer as there is for birds and mammals—and more than there is for
human neonates and preterm babies." (Page 153) (See
A Tribute to Dr. Victoria Braithwaite and Sentient Fishes.)

A stranded turtle I helped rescue from the middle of road, who was clearly
distressed and who relaxed when retrieved and relocated.
Stand by for discussions of future research on sentience in a wide variety of animals. It's high time to shelve outdated and unsupported ideas about animal sentience and to factor sentience into all of the innumerable ways in which we encounter other animals.
We also need more comparative studies on their cognitive lives. There's a tendency for fishes, reptiles, and amphibians to be written off as being "not all that smart"—this is also misleading, given available data.
As Lambert and her colleagues stress, it's essential to get this information out to the public, because a wide variety of reptiles are very popular companion animals; far too often, they're severely mistreated because it's assumed that they're dumb and insentient. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Notes
1) The researchers write, "Reptiles are a popular pet around the world, with
ownership likely to consist of tens of millions of animals, if not more [7].
Accurate numbers of the trade in exotic pets are unavailable due in part to
much of it involving illegally wild-caught animals [8]. In the UK, however,
between 2018–2019, there were thought to be around 1.7 million reptiles kept
as pets in homes [14]. Whereas, in 2017–2018, the USA was thought to have
9.4 million reptiles as pets [15]. The growing demand for reptiles has led
to an increase in their removal from the wild, and an increase in
captive-bred operations, both of which have considerable welfare
implications for the animals involved [16,17,18]." (Numbers refer to
references in their essay.)
2) For more discussion of reptile welfare, click here, and for more
information on the emotional lives of reptiles click here.
References
Return to: Animal Stories