The current pandemic is a symptom of the ongoing extinction crises. Exploitation of wildlife is the primary driver of the loss of marine species and the secondary driver of the loss of terrestrial species.
American mink - Ryzhkov Sergey, Wikimedia
GENEVA— The SARS-CoV-2 virus likely originated from human
exploitation of wildlife, according to today’s findings from a World
Health Organization-led investigation.
The report, based on a mission to China by WHO-appointed experts,
explored several theories about the pandemic’s cause. While no
definitive conclusions were reached, the report calls for further
research into wildlife and domestic animal farms in China and the
global wildlife and domestic animal trade through which the virus
could have been imported into the country. The report noted that all
hypotheses for the pandemic’s origin remain under consideration.
The report comes as U.S. lawmakers consider the Preventing Future
Pandemics Act, a bipartisan bill that would shut down the trade in
live terrestrial wild animals for human consumption, close wildlife
markets and spur international action to curtail future pandemics.
“This report highlights the urgent need to curb wildlife
exploitation and signals that wildlife trade could have led to the
pandemic,” said Tanya Sanerib, international legal director at the
Center for Biological Diversity. “Disease risk is a global threat.
Whether a bat is captured for food in southeast Asia or to make a
paperweight for a desk in the United States, people’s demand for
wildlife anywhere in the world creates a risk of new diseases
emerging.”
Based on the mission results, the report highlights the grave risk
wildlife and domestic animal farms pose for disease spillover. It
specifically calls for further investigation into fur farms. The
report notes that mink, a species commonly farmed for fur, could be
the source of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
“We know the conditions at factory farms, especially those involving
wild animals like mink, create perfect breeding grounds for highly
contagious diseases that can mutate and spread between people and
animals,” said Lori Ann Burd, environmental health director at the
Center. “Now the only question is, will we act on this knowledge to
help prevent the next pandemic, or will we sit back and let it
happen all over again?”
The report analyzed 38,515 livestock and poultry samples and 41,696
wild animal samples gathered from 31 provinces in China from 2018 to
2020, but none were positive for the coronavirus. The United States
lacks such a surveillance system for disease risk but drives
wildlife exploitation by consuming roughly 20% of the global
wildlife trade. Without tighter restrictions, the U.S. will continue
to fuel disease risk.
“Despite extensive surveillance of livestock and wildlife in China,
the pandemic wasn’t stopped. It’s clear that surveillance isn’t the
answer. Lawmakers need to curtail wildlife exploitation to halt new
diseases from emerging,” said Sanerib. “It’s time to pass the
Preventing Future Pandemics Act and for the U.S. to lead the world
in conserving and restoring wildlife populations and natural
ecosystems. Human salvation rests in the preservation of nature.”
The current pandemic is a symptom of the ongoing extinction crises.
Exploitation of wildlife is the primary driver of the loss of marine
species and the secondary driver of the loss of terrestrial species,
according to global experts. Curtailing the exploitation of wildlife
and nature to curb future pandemic risk will also help mitigate
biodiversity loss.
In Oregon legislation has been introduced to phase out Oregon’s mink
farming industry and provide training and support to the mink
farmers adversely affected by the virus. If passed into law, that
legislation, S.B. 832, will take a vital step towards protecting
communities and wildlife against future pandemic threats.