Animal Defenders of Westchester |
|
Home Page We advocate on all animal protection and exploitation issues, including experimentation, factory farming, rodeos, breeders and traveling animal acts. Animal Defenders of Westchester |
Action Alerts
March of Dimes Demonstration We will be conducting a peaceful demonstration against MARCH OF DIMES
cruel, wasteful experiments at their annual WALKATHON (*Information about
the March of Dimes appears below this alert): WHEN: SUNDAY, MAY 1st TIME: WALKATHON BEGINS REGISTERING WALKERS AT 8 AM; THE WALK BEGINS AT 9
AM. THE PRESS IS USUALLY THERE AT APPX 8:30 AM. PLEASE ATTEND AS CLOSE TO 8
AM AS POSSIBLE TO MAXIMIZE OUR EFFORT. WHERE: OUTSIDE SAXON WOODS, WHICH IS ACROSS FROM MOD HEADQUARTERS, 1275
MAMARONECK AVENUE IN WHITE PLAINS; (FREE PARKING AVAILABLE IN 'ETHICAL
CULTURE SOCIETY' PARKING LOT A FEW YARDS AWAY: 7 SAXON WOODS ROAD (SIGN
VISIBLE FROM MAMARONECK AVENUE). ABOUT THE MARCH OF DIMES: March of Dimes collects millions annually, to do painful experiments on
animals. Both animals and human babies are the losers, because every dollar
spent to harm these animals is a dollar that could have�and should have�been
used to help people. Please cut and paste the letter below onto a new email, sign the bottom
and send to: [email protected]
Then, please cut and paste this whole letter onto a new email, including
these instructions, and mail to friends and family. Thanks! Jennifer Howse Dear Jennifer Howse, Though I think the goal of preventing birth defects is a valuable one, I
don't think that the March of Dimes should use a penny of the millions of
dollars in donations it collects annually to do painful experiments on
animals. If most donors who generously open their pocketbooks to give were
aware that their gifts help fund these horrors, I'm sure they would withhold
their donations. Ms Howse, since I myself have become aware that the March
of Dimes has funneled millions of dollars into laboratory studies on
primates, rats, mice, cats, dogs, rabbits, pigs, sheep, guinea pigs,
opossums, and members of other animal species, I will do whatever I can to
stop it. Both animals and human babies are the losers, because every dollar spent
to harm these animals is a dollar that could have�and should have�been used
to help people. Recently, it's come to my attention that the March of Dimes' crimes
against animals involve experimenters: ~ sewing shut newborn kittens' eyes, then killed them after they had
endured a year of blindness. ~ putting newborn kittens in completely dark chambers, then killed them
after three to five months. ~ removing fetal kittens from the uterus, implanted pumps into their
backs to inject a drug that destroys nerves, then reimplanted the fetuses in
the uterus. After the kittens were born, they were killed and studied. ~ implanting electric pumps into the backs of pregnant rats to inject
nicotine, even though the dangers of cigarette smoking to human babies is
already known. ~ injecting pregnant rats with cocaine, though the dangers of cocaine to
human babies is already known. ~ injecting newborn opossums with alcohol, decapitated them an hour to 32
weeks later, then removed and studied the gonads (immature sexual organs),
though the dangers of alcohol to human babies is well known. ~ transplanting organs from pigs to baboons, most of whom died within
hours. ~ transplanting organs from guinea pigs to rats. ~ destroying the ear drums of unborn lambs, then killed the mother sheep
and lambs just before birth to examine the brains. Despite these experiments, the Centers for Disease Control reports that
birth defects are occurring more often. Of 38 birth defects studied over a
10-year period, an astounding 27 have increased in frequency, nine occur at
the same rate, and only two have decreased in frequency. There are many reasons for this, but the most important is that the human
physiology is vastly different from the physiologies of other species. It�s
true that all animals are sentient beings capable of feeling pain, but the
similarities essentially end there. For example, testing chemicals, pharmaceutical drugs, and addictive
substances on pregnant animals and then trying to apply the results to
humans is a waste of lives and money because humans are so different from
other animals. Consider that: ~ humans have a longer period of fetal development, so may be more
sensitive to birth defect-causing agents than other species. ~ genetic differences among species of animals affect the way they react
to chemicals. ~ different species develop in utero at different rates and along
different schedules, calling into question animal studies on chemicals that
affect fetuses at different stages of development. ~ differences in the placenta may affect the absorption of chemicals
among species. ~ the route of administration of a potential birth defect-causing agent
to the animal may not be the most common route of human exposure. For
instance, animals may be given nicotine intravenously, whereas human
exposure is through inhaling cigarette smoke. ~ animals are rarely given chemicals on the same time schedule as humans.
Animals are usually given a large amount of a substance over a short period,
while people are usually exposed to small amounts over a long period. ~ stress imposed by animal handling, food or water deprivation, and
restraint have been shown to affect test results. ~ animals learn and show intelligence differently from humans, and animal
studies usually cannot detect a substance�s potential for causing learning
or behavioral problems in babies. Even birth defects researchers admit the difficulty of interpreting
animal tests because any substance can harm fetal development if given in
the right dose to the right species at the right time. This is called "Karnofsky's
Law" and it�s often used by experimenters to excuse the inaccuracy of animal
studies. And, in contrast, human studies do save human lives. Virtually all known
developmental hazards were identified through studies of human populations.
Human-based research identified: ~ the dangers of thalidomide, a drug commonly given to pregnant women in
the 1950s that resulted in severe physical deformities; animal studies had
shown thalidomide to be safe. ~ the risk of birth defects associated with rubella during pregnancy. ~ the association of folic acid deficiency with spinal cord
abnormalities. ~ the disastrous effects of lead, methyl mercury, and alcohol on
developing fetuses. March of Dimes could save more babies if� ~�it put donations into under-funded programs that have been proven to
prevent birth defects and help babies. ~ An estimated 25 percent of all infant deaths could be prevented if
adequate pre-natal care were provided for the 1.2 million women who need it
every year. ~ Infant deaths would decrease by as much as 10 percent if women who
smoke (25 percent of pregnant women) gave up cigarettes during pregnancy.
~ Alcohol abuse during pregnancy is the leading cause of preventable
birth defects, and there are not enough affordable addiction treatment
programs for the women seeking help�yet precious resources are wasted
injecting rats and other animals with alcohol. ~ The establishment of a National Birth Defects Registry can help to
identify causes�and pave the way toward prevention of�birth defects. Data from the registry could be analyzed to look for possible patterns or
clusters of birth defects that may be associated with certain environmental
exposures or genetic traits. Animal studies can be dangerous and put babies at risk. The antibiotic
streptomycin was tested on dogs, guinea pigs, and pigs and deemed "safe" for
people. But infants who were given the drug suffered brain damage, went deaf
or blind, or died. In conclusion, Ms Howse, I urge you to stop the March of Dime's cruel and
painful testing on animals and instead adopt some of the alternative and
much more effective methods listed above. We are responsible for what we
know and the lives we touch. Please let your actions reflect care and
goodness, both for children and animals. Thank you so much. Sincerely, Fair Use Notice:
This document may contain copyrighted material whose use has not been
specifically authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this
not-for-profit, educational use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the
copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright
Law). If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own
that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright
owner. |
Your comments and
inquiries are welcome
(d-8)
This site is hosted and maintained by:
The Mary T. and Frank L. Hoffman Family Foundation
Thank you for visiting all-creatures.org.
Since