A recent study on anatomical predictions of muscle measurements based on experiments in mice showed that these are incorrect and can adversely impact surgical procedures on humans.
A prevailing myth is that even if animal experiments are problematic at the cellular or genetic level, we can learn something from them using the basic biomechanics of physiology. But this also has proven false. A recent study on anatomical predictions of muscle measurements based on experiments in mice showed that these are incorrect and can adversely impact surgical procedures on humans.
New research from the
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab further confirms that animals are poor
models for studying humans and reaffirms the need to replace animal
testing with superior, human-relevant alternatives.
The discovery that human muscle measurements are inaccurate happened
when scientists transplanted a human patient’s gracilis (leg) muscle
into the arm following an injury during which they measured the
muscle properties and scaling predictions.
Using information from previous animal studies, scientists had
estimated the measurement of human muscle contractile properties
based on those of mice, but by studying actual human muscles they
found significant differences that have important implications for
surgical procedures and research.