Barbara Stagno,CAARE Citizens for
Alternatives to Animal Research and Experimentation
August 2017
"This means that a drug developed to stimulate or inhibit a particular receptor which, in mice, can lead to increased insulin production, might have no effect on humans, or even could cause unbeneficial and diabetes-like symptoms," says Professor Stefan Amisten at Lund University in Sweden. Co-author Dr. Albert Salehi at King’s College London adds: "This is well known, and a source of great frustration for researchers and the pharmaceutical industry. Is it then right to continue to develop drugs based on research conducted on mice, when these drugs cannot be used on humans?"
Several recent studies have confirmed crucial differences between mice and humans that impact research into neurological disorders and diabetes. These studies add to the volume of previous research that demonstrates research with mice is highly questionable.
A study published in Nature Neuroscience looked closely at differences in human and mouse microglia, the most abundant type of cell in the nervous system. Scientists in the Netherlands and Brazil analyzed gene expression in microglia obtained from human autopsy samples and found that when analyzing how the cells aged, there was less than one percent overlap between human and mice microglia.
This has widespread impact on not just aging research, but for all
neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, multiple
sclerosis, and many others.
The results of that study were separately derived one month earlier in
another lab. A Stanford researcher examined microglia taken from surgical
brain biopsies of children with epilepsy, using similar methods of analysis
to the Netherlands study. The results were strikingly close.
Meanwhile researchers in the UK and Sweden investigated why diabetes drugs
that worked well in mice have not worked in people. They examined receptors
which control the function of insulin-producing cells in two strains of mice
typically used to study diabetes.
Their research revealed significant differences between mice and humans
in the beta cells of the pancreas, which are responsible for storing and
producing insulin.
For example, beta cells containing specific receptors, known as G
protein-coupled receptors, are found more abundantly in mice. Many diabetes
drugs developed to date were modeled on the presence of these receptors.
"This means that a drug developed to stimulate or inhibit a particular
receptor which, in mice, can lead to increased insulin production, might
have no effect on humans, or even could cause unbeneficial and diabetes-like
symptoms," says Professor Stefan Amisten at Lund University in Sweden.
Co-author Dr. Albert Salehi at King’s College London adds: "This is well
known, and a source of great frustration for researchers and the
pharmaceutical industry. Is it then right to continue to develop drugs based
on research conducted on mice, when these drugs cannot be used on humans?"
Presented with this information, most reasonable people would conclude
that it’s time to abandon the mouse model. But not scientists who have
vested their careers in studying them
Instead, animal researchers cling to similarities and ignore the
differences, but this is disingenuous. Even a banana shares 60% of human
DNA, demonstrating the senselessness of drawing conclusions based on
isolated scientific data.
Science is supposed to be scientific. That should rule out justifying
experiments on non-human animals based on meaningless similarities while
ignoring the sweeping differences.
But unfortunately it hasn’t, and animals continue to suffer and die for
experiments that result in a 90% failure rate for successful drugs and
therapies for people.
Citizens for Alternatives to Animal Research (CAARE), is a 501(c)(3)
non-profit organization, established to highlight and promote research
without animals.
Please donate to support CAARE’s mission to end animal suffering by
disseminating information about the power and progress of research without
animals.text
Return to Alternatives to Animal Testing, Experimentation and Dissection