PETA
March 2011
If an alien species ever does visit our planet, I hope we'll be able to impress them with how far we have "advanced"—far enough to treat animals with respect and compassion by not using them as food.
"To Serve Man" is a marvelous science fiction short story written in 1950
by Damon Knight. In it, an alien species called the "Kanamit" arrives on
Earth, offering to give humankind "the peace and plenty which we ourselves
enjoy." People's initial distrust gives way to gratitude as the Kanamit
offer a cheap source of limitless energy, a device to render weapons of war
obsolete, and cures for heart disease and cancer. To find out more about the
aliens, two men try to learn their language with the help of a stolen book.
After much effort, they translate the book's title as "How to Serve Man,"
which seems to prove the Kanamit's benevolent intent. But when the men
finally succeed in translating the first paragraph of "How to Serve Man,"
they discover that it is a cookbook!
What makes the story especially horrifying is that all the generosity of the
aliens suddenly appears in a different light: They are fattening up
livestock for slaughter. Even though the Kanamit have made Earth a paradise
with the abolition of hunger and war, they are revealed to be anything but
benefactors—instead, they are enemies attempting to enslave humans as food
animals.
But the Kanamit themselves might see things differently. After all, they
have space travel, they've abolished war on their home planet, and they've
developed sophisticated technology. They are more "advanced," more
"intelligent," and altogether worthy to dine on lesser species, right? They
are even humane in their treatment of humankind—the vast majority of people
will live healthier and happier lives under their rule.
"To Serve Man" is a pretty accurate description of our relationship with
animals. We are the Kanamit to the billions of individual cows, pigs,
chickens, and fish who are our food. People often state that we have the
right to eat animals because we are more "advanced" or "intelligent" than
they are. It's not a convincing argument when you consider how we'd feel
about being eaten by an even more "advanced" species. Since when does
"intelligence" bear any relationship to a sentient being's ability to feel
joy or suffer from pain?
Another argument that people make in defense of eating animals is the
animals' quality of life. "They are well-fed and protected from the weather
and from predators." "They wouldn't even be alive at all if it weren't for
us." "They die quick and painless deaths." In other words, animals are the
fortunate beneficiaries of all that we do for them; giving their lives for
our meals is the least they can do in return.
But from the animals' perspective, it's a different story. Egg-laying hens
and breeding sows live lives of nonstop misery, crammed into cages so small
that they can't even extend their limbs. The babies of cows used for dairy
and those of pigs are forcibly separated from their mothers within a few
days of birth, sometimes immediately. Many animals are improperly stunned at
the slaughterhouse, leaving them to die slow and agonizing deaths on the
disassembly line. And all animals on factory farms are killed while still
young, living out only a small fraction of their natural lifespan. It would
be far better for them never to have lived at all than to live as mere
commodities in our modern factory farming systems.
If humans were obligate carnivores like tigers or dolphins, we'd face some
serious ethical and environmental dilemmas in feeding our worldwide
population of almost 7 billion. But humans don't need to eat animals to
thrive. The American Dietetic Association states that "appropriately planned
vegetarian diets, including total vegetarian or vegan diets, are healthful
[and] nutritionally adequate …." People eat animals because they're used to
doing it and because they like the taste—not because they need to.
If an alien species ever does visit our planet, I hope we'll be able to
impress them with how far we have "advanced"—far enough to treat animals
with respect and compassion by not using them as food.
Return to Animal Rights Articles
Read more at The Meat
and Dairy Industries