Bruce Friedrich
July 2007
More than 260 million acres of U.S. forest have been cleared to create cropland to grow grain to feed farmed animals; farmed animals are fed more than 70 percent of the corn, wheat, and other grains grown in the U.S.; and almost half of the water and 80 percent of the agricultural land in the U.S. are used to raise animals for food.
I’m tempted to move to Britain, and not just because I saw an early
screening of Michael Moore’s amazing new movie, Sicko (go see it; tell all
your friends). What got me is that an official with the UK’s Environment
Agency has acknowledged that humans can significantly help stop global
warming by adopting a vegetarian diet.
Of course, the science could not be more clear. When U.N. scientists looked
at all the evidence, they declared in a 408-page report titled Livestock’s
Long Shadow that raising animals for food is responsible for more greenhouse
gases than all vehicles in the world combined. And scientists at the
University of Chicago showed that a typical American meat-eater is
responsible for nearly 1.5 tons more carbon dioxide a year than a vegan.
But for someone in government to admit this is something special, since even
Al Gore refuses to talk about it (which makes me think that perhaps he is
planning to run). What happened is that someone posted a comment on the
Environment Agency’s Web site asking, “Adopting a vegan diet reduces one
person’s impact on the environment even more than giving up their car or
forgoing several plane trips a year! Why aren’t you promoting this message
as part of your [World Environment Day] campaign?”
In response, an Environment Agency official wrote that the “potential
benefit of a vegan diet in terms of climate impact could be very
significant” and offered assurances that the Department of Environment, Food
and Rural Affairs is working on a set of “key environmental behaviour
changes” to mitigate climate change—including promoting vegetarianism.
Indeed, study after study has shown that animal agriculture contributes to
global warming and environmental destruction, yet instead of urging people
to go vegetarian, most U.S. politicians and environmental spokespeople just
continue to hype hybrid cars, recycling, and fluorescent light bulbs as
solutions to our spiraling environmental problems.
This is just not good enough. Vegetarians in Hummers do more for the planet
than do meat-eaters who cruise around in hybrids or collect recyclable soda
cans. Now that George Bush has finally acknowledged that global warming is a
reality, perhaps he could follow his vegetarian niece, Lauren Bush—and
former first daughter Chelsea Clinton—in adopting a vegetarian diet. I’m not
going to hold my breath until this happens, but it would be gratifying for
representatives of the U.S. government to acknowledge the absolute fact that
what people eat is more important than what they drive.
Carbon dioxide emissions aren’t our only environmental concern, of course.
There’s deforestation, water and air pollution, world hunger, and more.
According to Greenpeace, chickens raised for KFC and other companies that
“produce” chicken flesh are fed crops that are grown in the Amazon rain
forest. And according to the U.N. report, raising animals for food is “one
of the top two or three most significant contributors to the most serious
environmental problems, at every scale from local to global.”
To whit, more than 260 million acres of U.S. forest have been cleared to
create cropland to grow grain to feed farmed animals; farmed animals are fed
more than 70 percent of the corn, wheat, and other grains grown in the U.S.;
and almost half of the water and 80 percent of the agricultural land in the
U.S. are used to raise animals for food.
There is also the unappetizing synopsis by Scripps Howard of a Senate
Agricultural Committee report on animal waste and the environment: “[I]t’s
untreated and unsanitary, bubbling with chemicals and diseased. … It goes
onto the soil and into the water that many people will, ultimately, bathe in
and wash their clothes with and drink. It is poisoning rivers and killing
fish and making people sick. … Catastrophic cases of pollution, sickness,
and death are occurring in areas where livestock operations are
concentrated. … Every place where the animal factories have located,
neighbors have complained of falling sick.”
If that’s not enough to make you feel a little queasy, consider this:
Consuming animal products isn’t just making the environment sick—it’s making
us sick, too. Meat, eggs, and dairy foods are high in cholesterol, saturated
fat, calories, and concentrated protein. Animal products are known to
contribute to heart disease, diabetes, certain types of cancer, obesity, and
other debilitating diseases.
And don’t forget that more than 10 billion animals are killed each year in
the U.S. alone to feed our meat addictions. We’re talking about an awful lot
of suffering.
And for what? Chicken nuggets, hamburgers, hot dogs, cheese pizza, scrambled
eggs, and other foods that have healthy, humane, and environmentally
friendly counterparts. I can’t imagine why anyone would cause such suffering
and devastation when there is a better option: a vegetarian diet. Why not
give it a try?
If you need some tips, please check out www.VegCooking.com for recipes, meal
plans, cookbook recommendations, and more. It’s not too late to reverse the
changes in our climate, but all of us need to take steps to reduce
greenhouse gases, and we need to take them soon. Your next meal would be a
good time to start.
Bruce Friedrich is vice president in charge of international grassroots campaigns for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA). He has been a progressive and animal activist for more than 20 years.
Return to Environmental Articles