Rachel Krantz,
CommonDreams.org
August 2017
To call yourself an environmentalist and ignore what eating animals is doing to our planet is hypocritical and perpetuates the selfishness that got us into this mess in the first place. If you really care about the environment, take the film’s pledge to #BeInconvenient, and tell everyone you know that one of the biggest things they can do to fight climate change is to leave animals off their plates. Whether or not they find your statement inconvenient, it’s the truth.
"To give you an idea, if every American committed to just one meat-free
day a week, the impact would be equivalent to switching all our gas-powered
cars to hybrids." (Photo: Neil H/flickr/cc)
When I spotted fellow vegan James Cromwell in line for food at an advance
screening of An Inconvenient Sequel: Truth to Power, I couldn’t help but try
to talk to him. Recently arrested at a protest against SeaWorld, the Babe
and Six Feet Under actor is a remarkable environmental and animal activist.
“Can you believe they’re serving chickens here?” I asked him. “I mean, I
guess it’s a little better for the environment than eating cows, but it’s
still ironic to be serving animals at a party for a documentary about
climate change.”
“Yeah, really!” Cromwell answered. “Besides the damage it does to the
atmosphere from methane release, and the terrible torment of the animals, it
is destroying us spiritually. You eat one hamburger and have no idea of the
process that led to that one hamburger, how many animals suffered, how much
waste, what it does to us, and what it does to the planet.”
He’s right. We aren’t serious enough about the impact our diet has on the
environment, despite overwhelming evidence. For instance, to produce one
hamburger takes as much water as two months’ worth of showering.
Additionally, the livestock sector is one of the largest sources of carbon
dioxide emissions and the single largest source of both methane and nitrous
oxide. And according to the World Bank, animal agriculture is responsible
for nearly 90 percent of Amazon rainforest destruction, with more than
80,000 acres of forest—and 135 animal and plant species—lost each day.
Simply put, animal agriculture is one of the main culprits behind climate
change. An Inconvenient Truth failed to address this, and people have been
wondering whether the sequel would make up for it, particularly since it
again stars Al Gore, who himself went vegan after realizing the connection
between animal agriculture and global warming. Unfortunately, as James
Cromwell and I were about to find out, the sequel likewise failed. And
that’s truly disappointing.
Instead, too much of the new documentary was devoted to spotlighting former
vice president Gore as a leader, rather than informing viewers about the
many concrete actions they can take to limit their carbon footprint, like
adopting a plant-based diet.
At the end of the film, the audience is asked to take the pledge to
#BeInconvenient, to keep demanding that schools, businesses, and towns
invest in clean, renewable energy. “If President Trump refuses to lead,
Americans will,” the call to action reads, encouraging viewers who want to
fight climate change to use “your choice, your voice, your vote.” This is
great, but aside from a few seconds where Gore mentions that “agriculture is
another major cause” of CO2 emissions, the link between climate change and
eating animals is entirely left out of the film.
And any environmentalist worth her salt should find that outrageous.
The link between our diet and the environment is both direct and strong. To
give you an idea, if every American committed to just one meat-free day a
week, the impact would be equivalent to switching all our gas-powered cars
to hybrids. In fact, according to research published in the journal Climate
Change, if you adopt a plant-based diet, you’ll cut your carbon footprint in
half.
Yet these facts are nowhere to be found in this supposedly environmentalist
documentary.
Perhaps the filmmakers thought that mainstream viewers couldn’t handle the
truth. I like to think otherwise.
It’s time for environmentalists to face reality and start acknowledging the
impact animal agriculture has on climate change. As Cromwell told me, “You
can’t consume another creature out of sloth, ignorance, and unconsciousness
and then switch that off and go with dedication and consciousness in another
area of your life. You have to be conscious in the entire course of living.”
To call yourself an environmentalist and ignore what eating animals is doing
to our planet is hypocritical and perpetuates the selfishness that got us
into this mess in the first place. If you really care about the environment,
take the film’s pledge to #BeInconvenient, and tell everyone you know that
one of the biggest things they can do to fight climate change is to leave
animals off their plates. Whether or not they find your statement
inconvenient, it’s the truth.
Rachel Krantz is the former Senior Features Editor and a founding editor of Bustle. Currently, she works as Lead Writer for the animal rights organization Mercy For Animals. She is also the host of Bustle's podcast Honestly Though. You can find her work across the Internet on sites like The Huffington Post, NPR, The Daily Beast, Newsweek, Jezebel, Mental Floss, Hello Giggles, XOJane, Marie Claire, and elsewhere. She’s the recipient of the Peabody Award, The Robert F. Kennedy Center for Justice and Human Rights International Radio Award, The Investigative Reporters and Editors Radio Award, and the Edward R. Murrow Award for her work as an investigative reporter for Youth Radio.
Return to Environmental Articles