Environmental ArticlesA tar sands skirmish for human and animal rights
An Environmental Article from All-Creatures.org


Other Nations
March 2014

I’m making the case that fighting tar sands development is, in addition to a human rights and environmental battle, an animal rights battle. And like all animal rights struggles, it’s a fight we have to wage for them: for songbirds, fish, and ducks; for turtles, muskrats, and beavers; for bears, wolves, and caribou.

Well I won’t back down, no I won’t back down.
You can stand me up at the gates of hell
But I won’t back down.
~Tom Petty & the Heartbreakers

Nothing says gates of hell like Alberta, Canada’s tar sands, often referred to as the most environmentally-destructive industrial project on earth. Plants, animals, land, people–all are laid to waste, incidental victims of the monstrous, insatiable fossil fuel machine. None will ultimately escape the havoc of climate change when the machine eventually comes home to roost with all of us. One of its many, grasping tentacles has already reached into my own western Montana neighborhood–and will likely return.

In the past four months, three Alberta-bound “megaloads” of tar sands equipment (pictured here) moved through the Pacific Northwest from the Port of Umatilla on the Columbia River (OR), traversing southern Idaho before heading north into Montana. Manufactured in South Korea, the behemoth loads are both pulled and pushed on their overland route by semi tractors–typically spanning entire roadways and requiring rolling closures. Along the route, tribal people–both defending treaty land interests and standing in solidarity with their northern cousins–and climate activists have turned out to protest. The first load was significantly delayed when two people locked themselves to the transport rig in Oregon.

Raging–and dancing–against the machine

About 80 of us–from Indian People’s Action and indigenous mass movement Idle No More, Northern Rockies Rising Tide, Blue Skies Campaign, and other local and regional groups, as well as individual activists–halted the third load on a busy artery in Missoula on March 14th at 12:30 a.m. (the city restricts megaload movement between midnight and 5:00 a.m.). For 20 minutes we obstructed the transport–a load weighing 794,000 pounds and measuring 380 feet long, 23 feet wide, and 19 feet tall (source). Tribal folks drummed and sang and activists circled in a round dance; the rumbling roar of the transport rig and flashing strobes from many squad cars imbued the darkness with a surreal air. When the authorities deemed it time for the megaload to move forward, three climate-activist grandmothers sat down in front of the rig as they had previously, and were again arrested. Eight-hundred miles lay between our act of civil disobedience and the tar sands directly north, but as the constituent of carnage and extinction rolled past, it was impossible to forget its target: the boreal forest and its human and nonhuman animal inhabitants.

Tar sands: A crime against all life

tar sandsThe First Nations community of Fort Chipewyan is less than 200 miles downstream and downwind from tar sands operations. According to Oil Change International, “It was back in 2009 that the Alberta Cancer Board found that certain types of rare cancer were at elevated rates in the community… The shocking statistic was that some cancers were occurring 30 per cent more frequently than the provisional average.” In 2010, native children in Fort Chip released a four-minute video about the tar sands’ deadly impact on their environment and their lives.

Earlier this year, Canadian Neil Young blasted the government, calling the tar sands a war zone and launching an “Honor the Treaties” tour to raise money for Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation legal defense. “We made a deal with these people,” he said. “We are breaking our promise. We are killing these people. The blood of these people will be on modern Canada’s hands.”

tar sands crimeNo deals were made with the nonhuman victims of the tar sands, which lie under 54,000+ square miles of boreal forest and muskeg (Algonquin for “grassy bog”). In 2010 a storm forced 550 ducks to land on toxic waste ponds and pavement instead of the pristine waters that once characterized the land; though they died or were subsequently destroyed, no charges were filed. “Sometimes incidents happen,” said Alberta’s Premier.

Two years earlier, the count was 1600 ducks, with video capturing their distress as they struggled and died in the thick, tarry sludge (Syncrude paid $3 million in penalties that time). Depending on how extensively the tar sands are developed, a 2008 report “projects a cumulative impact over the next 30 to 50 years ranging from a low of about 6 million birds lost to as many as 166 million birds lost.”

According to the Boreal Songbird Initiative, “nearly 50% of the 700 species that regularly occur in the U.S. and Canada rely on the boreal for their survival. Over 300 species regularly breed in the boreal.” Our silent spring may yet arrive.

tar sands crimeIn 2011, 145 black bears were killed by conservation officers when they came into conflict with tar sands camps and residential areas. Canadian scientist and environmentalist David Suzuki, writing about the boreal woodland caribou, said,

One endangered herd in Alberta’s tar sands region west of Fort McMurray is at great risk of disappearing. Clear-cutting and no-holds-barred oil and gas exploration and development have affected more than 60 percent of the habitat of the Red Earth caribou herd, leaving little undisturbed forest where it can feed, breed, and roam.
~”Woodland caribou are at a crossroads“

And the beat goes on. Alberta’s “solution” to easing pressure on caribou has been to systematically kill the wolves that naturally prey on them.

The cost of mining dirty, climate-altering tar sands bitumen is too astronomically high at every step of the process. Add in climate change–producing a barrel of oil from the tar sands produces three times more greenhouse gas emissions than producing a barrel of conventional oil–and it’s biocide on a planetary scale.

Hey, baby–there ain’t no easy way out…

I’m making the case that fighting tar sands development is, in addition to a human rights and environmental battle, an animal rights battle. And like all animal rights struggles, it’s a fight we have to wage for them: for songbirds, fish, and ducks; for turtles, muskrats, and beavers; for bears, wolves, and caribou.

In standing our ground, we’re standing theirs. And we won’t back down–because we simply can’t back down.


Return to: Environmental Articles