People for the Ethical
Treatment of Animals (PETA)
August 2015
UniverSoul knows that kind people like Ms. Sloan will not buy tickets to circuses that mistreat animals, so it deliberately promotes itself as something it is not: a champion of animal rights.
Washington, D.C. residents who attended UniverSoul’s shows during the past three years and who are interested in joining the class action lawsuit should contact PETA Foundation attorney Martina Bernstein at [email protected] for more information.
On behalf of Washington, D.C., resident Melanie Sloan and others, PETA Foundation lawyers have filed a lawsuit in Superior Court of the District of Columbia against UniverSoul Circus alleging a campaign of deceit aimed at hoodwinking compassionate people, who want to do nothing of the kind, into supporting and perpetuating the abuse of animals.
The lawsuit details how Sloan—a legal and communications professional and
longtime supporter of animal rights—purchased UniverSoul tickets for herself
and her daughter on the basis of dishonest information on the circus’s
website. But she discovered that UniverSoul used animals provided by
exhibitors with long histories of federal Animal Welfare Act violations, so
she and her daughter stayed home on the day of the show. She is now suing
UniverSoul on behalf of anyone who bought tickets to the D.C. shows as a
result of misleading information provided by the circus.
“UniverSoul knows that kind people like Ms. Sloan will not buy tickets to
circuses that mistreat animals, so it deliberately promotes itself as
something it is not: a champion of animal rights,” says Martina Bernstein,
PETA Foundation director of litigation. “PETA is calling for UniverSoul to
make good on its empty animal-welfare claims and end the use of tormented
wild animals in its shows.”
Sloan stated, “As soon as I learned UniverSoul mistreats animals, I
cancelled my plans to attend the circus. I can’t teach my daughter about the
importance of treating animals humanely, but then take her to a show where
they are abused.”
On its website, UniverSoul proclaims that none of its animal suppliers has
ever been cited for animal abuse while performing with the circus, but PETA
has documented that many of them have been cited by U.S. Department of
Agriculture inspectors while on tour with UniverSoul. For example, its
elephant suppliers, Jorge and Louann Barreda, have been cited for failing to
maintain a program of adequate foot care for elephants. (Foot problems are
one of the leading reasons why captive elephants are euthanized.) And
notorious big-cat exhibitor Mitchel Kalmanson has been repeatedly cited for
keeping big cats in cramped transport cages and not letting them out to
stretch their legs. One citation was for confining the animals that way for
24 hours a day for at least four to seven weeks at a time. Kalmanson has
also been cited for failing to provide animals with veterinary
care—including for a limping tiger whose ailment, inspectors noticed, had
gone “unrecognized and undiagnosed”—as well as for keeping a chain fastened
around a tiger’s neck, causing risk of “injury or strangulation.”
Washington, D.C. residents who attended UniverSoul’s shows during the past
three years and who are interested in joining the class action lawsuit
should contact PETA Foundation attorney Martina Bernstein at
[email protected] for more
information.
Return to: Litigation