Readers' Comments - Comments by Stephen Augustine 17 June 2002
January 2003
Maynard and Others,
I've been thinking about this thread in the past few days since I had a
conversation with my rather evangelistic neighbour, Alan, who lives down the
street. Alan always takes any opportunity to invite folks to his church and
to ultimately accept Jesus as their Lord and Saviour as the path to Heaven.
Until two weeks ago we lived next to a 4-acre dense thicket of trees and
blackberry brambles. The thicket was home to rabbits, pheasants, quail,
raccoons, and birds of all kinds. The property owner in an attempt to make
the land more saleable decided to clear all the brush and small trees. So,
now we live next to a bare 4-acre patch of ground quite devoid of avian and
vertebrate life.
I happened to meet Alan on the street and bemoaned to him the loss of the
thicket and the habitat it provided for the multitude of birds and animals.
Alan wasn't particularly concerned and in fact was somewhat pleased because
the two rabbits that lived in the thicket liked eating seedlings in his
vegetable garden and now the rabbits were conveniently displaced. I then
expressed concern for the plight of the rabbits (and other animals) now that
their home was destroyed and mentioned that good stewardship of God's
creation would call us to hold concern for the animals that lived in the
thicket. To this Alan responded saying that it was proper for us to control
the rampant populations of animals. I asked him how he interpreted the
Genesis stewardship directive and his response was that it meant that humans
were to manage Earth's resources to our benefit and part of that management
strategy should include managing animal populations. I asked him if in fact
the problem was not with rampant animal populations but with rampant human
population growth and shouldn't we take voluntary steps to curb our own
population? Alan said that that decision was to be left to God and was not
anything that we should address. The conversation proceeded for a while with
my putting out some of the ideals of Christianity (such as vegetarianism)
and Alan responding with the limitations (God granted permission for a
carnivorous diet).
So, if I was an "animal rights activist" being exposed to Christianity
through my neighbour I'm not sure that that would have have a very pleasant
introduction. In my mind there were two glaring issues, the first was the
almost complete lack of compassion for non-humans and the second was the
insistence on human supremacy and the unspoken right to procreate until we
are as "numerous as the stars in the sky". I wonder if my encounter with
Alan is a true reflection of the larger conversation that is going on
everywhere else with state of the natural world and the corresponding
Christian response.
In this instance would "animal rights and vegetarianism" be better off
ignoring Alan or might it fail if those concerned did not enter into
dialogue with Alan?
In Christ's Peace,
Stephen
Return to Readers'
Comments
Return to Animal Rights Articles