When I mention my concerns about the cruelty climate change is imposing on animals, I suspect that most folks think of starving polar bears or koalas consumed by the unprecedented fury of contemporary brush fires in Australia. Of course, those are among a massively growing collection of perils being directly visited upon the shrinking populations of the world’s wildlife. But, there are indirect dangers.
We humans are by far the world’s most deadly destroyer of species and our activities directly and indirectly contribute to the carnage. Moose can survive parasites and predators, but they probably cannot, I fear, survive us.
Photo by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (https://flic.kr/p/bsphpr) via:
freeforcommercialuse.org
When I mention my concerns about the cruelty climate change is imposing on
animals, I suspect that most folks think of starving polar bears or koalas
consumed by the unprecedented fury of contemporary brush fires in Australia.
Of course, those are among a massively growing collection of perils being
directly visited upon the shrinking populations of the world’s wildlife.
But, there are indirect dangers. In New Hampshire and Maine, it’s been
estimated that over a three year period some 70 percent of moose calves
failed to survive. It’s already known that, throughout much of their
forested range in the northern U.S. and across much of Canada, there have
been severe moose declines. A recent study in New Brunswick verified that
one profound problem is the growing numbers of ticks.
These small, bloodsucking arachnids have been around since the Cretaceous
(146 to 66 million years ago). From the time of the dinosaurs until the
present they’ve been sucking blood. One New Brunswick moose was the
unwitting host to about 80,000 ticks. Not only can ticks transmit disease,
but in such high numbers they can remove too much blood, weakening the host
animal’s ability to survive.
Experts studying climate have determined that winters are milder with less
snow, on average, than previously, and biologists know this enhances winter
survival of ticks, as well as their northward expansion. And then, there is
brainworm, Parelaphostrongylus tenuis, a nematode parasite that infects
white-tailed deer. The white-tails have co-evolved with the neurotropic worm
and tend to survive, but not so the moose. Warmer weather and forestry
practices have encouraged northward movement of white-tails into traditional
moose habitat, with disastrous results for the moose who may sicken and die
from the effects of the brainworm. That is in addition to the swarms of
mosquitoes and blackflies that, each summer, can drive a moose to
distraction. But, mosquitoes, blackflies, and moose have always co-existed.
Brainworms, a burgeoning populations of ticks, and habitat loss are new
impositions and, in response, moose numbers have dramatically declined in
many regions.
Whether or not the rate of global climate change can be slowed or halted
will be known at some distant future time. Meanwhile, what can
conservationists do to help moose survival?
Stop killing them? That seems to be the first, and most simple, solution to
the problem, but no, sport and trophy hunters are too fond of killing moose
to do that. They prefer to expand the killing to natural moose predators.
Bears have been known to eat moose calves, so kill bears. Wolves too. Kill,
kill, kill!. It’s what we do, and we see endless schemes to try to reduce
the harm of such killing by restricting number of hunters through the use of
lotteries to choose who gets to do the killing, and questioning if calves
should be hunted or protected. (Hint: they should be protected, along with
adults.)
Change happens, and animals adapt through the evolutionary process, but
sport and trophy hunting interferes with adaptation by removing not those
animals most vulnerable to change, but those most sought by the hunter –
often those animals that are the largest and healthiest in a population.
Hunters like to claim they “take” the animals “surplus” to the number needed
to perpetuate the species. but no healthy animal is “surplus” in a declining
population. Bears and wolves co-evolved with moose over tens of thousands of
years. They are not new to each other. What is new is high-powered weaponry.
Mind you, when humans first arrived in North America as long as 15,000 years
ago, they triggered a wave of extinctions of both far more large predators
than are here today, and more kinds of deer and other herbivorous species,
with weapons we would think are absurdly primitive.
We humans are by far the world’s most deadly destroyer of species and our
activities directly and indirectly contribute to the carnage. Moose can
survive parasites and predators, but they probably cannot, I fear, survive
us.
Keep Wildlife in the Wild,
Barry
Return to Environmental Articles