The role of shelter veterinarians, shelter directors, law, and public policy in decisions that cost animals their lives.
Over the last few months, I have received a number of emails from shelter
directors through
The No Kill
Advocacy Center reporting that staff veterinarians are pushing
for policies that would increase killing. This includes demanding the
ability to “exclusively dictate all euthanasia,” “restrict foster care,” and
“limit treatment options.” They claim their decisions on these issues should
not be “subject to review.”
In many ways, the problem is not new. The veterinary profession tends to be
overly cautious, suspicious of change, insecure and thus hyper-sensitive
about jurisdiction. (In private practice, they are also concerned with
protecting profits). That is why industry lobbyists historically opposed
municipally-funded spay/neuter clinics, expanding the abilities of
veterinary assistants and veterinary technicians to do work traditionally
done by veterinarians, SPCA-run wellness clinics, and telemedicine.
Likewise, the veterinarians I supervised at the San Francisco SPCA in the
1990s consistently complained about new programs and expansion of existing
ones as part of our nationally-groundbreaking No Kill initiative — programs
that reduced killing to national all-time lows, ushered in the No Kill
revolution, and are now industry standard.
....
Please read the ENTIRE ARTICLE HERE.
Return to Companion Animal Care