Focusing on fossil fuels in relation to plant leathers seemed to want to erase the fact that fossil fuels are used throughout the production of animal leather – for example, leather is coated in plastic to keep it from naturally degrading, which in part accounts for its longevity – but it also forgot that innovation is actually removing fossil fuel-derived ingredients from vegan leathers.

Photo from Moving Animals
The recent Guardian piece ‘We are creating a material monster – the
false logic of faux leather’ by Tamsin Blanchard got many things
right. Overproduction and the harmful effects of fossil fuel-derived
materials on the environment are in fact issues that should be high
on fashion's agenda. But in its criticisms of faux leather-centric
collections such as Kylie Jenner's latest KHY range, The Guardian
forgot the elephant – or perhaps the cow – in the room: animal
leather.
Tamsin Blanchard, known for her (excellent) work in the
sustainability space, does briefly mention the impact of animal
skins on the environment and the fact that vegan leathers are
gaining popularity. However, the reasons for this shift are entirely
glossed over. In recent years as never before, the leather industry
has faced increased scrutiny.
Not only did the Pulse of Fashion
Industry report find it to be the material with the highest
cradle-to-gate environmental impact, but numerous undercover
investigations also brought to light the treatment of the animals
whose lives were lost to biker jackets, clutch bags and kitten
heels.
Produced at the rate we're currently going, leather is an enormous
environmental problem. Leather production has a great eutrophication
impact – eutrophication is an environmental problem that sees runoff
waste interfere with ecosystems by causing plant overgrowth in
waterways. This disrupts the fragile systems and kills animals by
affecting oxygen levels in the water.
....
Please read the ENTIRE ARTICLE HERE.