The work adds to a growing body of research suggesting that bioplastics, which are derived from plant materials or other biological feedstocks, are not necessarily safer than plastics that come from petroleum.
Image by
Julian Zwenge, Unsplash
Bioplastics, often considered a safer alternative to synthetic plastics, may
in some cases be toxic to soil organisms, a worrisome finding that indicates
a need for more thorough testing, according to a new study.
The work adds to a growing body of research suggesting that bioplastics,
which are derived from plant materials or other biological feedstocks, are
not necessarily safer than plastics that come from petroleum.
The new study, published this month in Environmental Science and Technology,
found that two types of bioplastic fibers were more toxic to earthworms than
were bits of conventional polyester. While promoted as “environmentally
friendly,” the alternative materials actually may be more harmful in some
ways than the conventional plastic, the study determined.
“We need more comprehensive testing of these materials before they are used
as alternatives to plastics,” said Bangor University researcher Winnie
Courtene-Jones, who is lead author of the study.
Bio-based fibers like viscose and lyocell are used in clothing, especially
in fast fashion, but also in wet wipes and a range of other products. The
study said more than 320,000 metric tons were produced in the textile
industry in 2022 and that is expected to continue to climb. When such
clothes are washed, they can shed fibers into wastewater. Thousands of tons
of sewage sludge are added to farmlands around the world, which can directly
transmit such fibers into the soil.
The study authors said they exposed worms to fibers from polyester, as well
as viscose and lyocell, which are made from cellulose and used in “natural”
fabrics. They found that after three days, 30% of the first group died,
while the death toll was 60% for viscose, and 80% for lyocell.
Effects of various products on worms are important to study since these
animals live throughout much of the world churning and aerating soil,
providing vital ecological services. Moreover, if worms are negatively
affected, the same is likely true for hundreds of other overlooking
soil-dwelling species.
In the study, scientists also looked at longer-term impacts of all three
fibers to worms at concentrations likely to be found in soils where such
sludge is applied. They found that worms exposed to the biobased materials
had impaired fertility compared to animals in contact with polyester fibers.
“This study shows us that the bio-based fibers are not inherently better
than synthetic fibers,” said Bethanie Carney Almroth, an ecotoxicologist at
the University of Gothenburg in Sweden who wasn’t involved in the paper.
In this paper, the fibers were put into soils in the lab without any
additives, and the toxic effects seem to have something to do with the
structural or chemical nature of the materials themselves, Courtene-Jones
said. Bioplastics can also leach toxic additives or breakdown products, much
like conventional plastics.
Bioplastics and so-called biodegradable plastics do not necessarily break
down quickly, or at all, in conditions found in soils or the environment.
Biodegradable and “compostable” plastics often have to be exposed to very
specific conditions, such as high heat, to disintegrate.
In trying to reduce plastic pollution and make plastics safer, we must be
careful about not replacing petroleum-based products with bio-based ones
that may be even worse, in some cases, Almroth said.
That will be particularly important to keep in mind at the last of five
scheduled meetings intended to create a global treaty to end plastic
pollution, a process convened by the United Nations, taking place later this
month in South Korea.