Criticisms include: lack of scientific evidence in favor of suppoerters' claims; inability to produce enough food to feed the global population through regenerative farming alone; potential for industrial farms or big brands to use regenerative terminology as a form of greenwashing....
Regenerative agriculture, also called regenerative farming, has its
roots in practices that indiginous people used to maintain healthy
land and support successful harvests.[1] By contrast, today’s
conventional food production methods often deplete soil and pollute
waterways while consuming large amounts of natural resources.
Many people see regenerative agriculture as a way to reverse this
damage and bring the environment back into balance, but others view
these claims with skepticism. Is moving from intensive farming for
maximum yield to a regenerative system focused on long-term
improvements the solution to today’s climate challenges?
Regenerative Farming Defined
Regeneration International, a nonprofit focused on ending global warming and world hunger through regenerative practices, defines regenerative agriculture as “a holistic land management practice that leverages the power of photosynthesis in plants to close the carbon cycle, and build soil health, crop resilience, and nutrient density.”[2] Farming this way takes all the elements of the ecosystem into account, leveraging their natural interactions to renew the land and reduce emissions.
Regenerative farmers follow five basic principles to accomplish these goals:[3]
Taken together, these practices build the soil, maintain a healthy
soil ecosystem, and reintroduce both carbon and nitrogen into the
ground, which are often depleted by growing crops. Soil inputs
usually include compost, compost tea, and natural fertilizers from
animal and plant sources—instead of chemical fertilizers,
herbicides, and pesticides—and farmers seek to minimize the need for
irrigation by making use of water already available in the area.
Is Regenerative Agriculture Realistic?
Supporters of regenerative farming see it as a way to protect,
conserve, and rehabilitate the planet while producing healthier
food. Their claims are starting to get attention from researchers in
fields like ecology and environmental science, but some critics
aren’t convinced the purported benefits will stand up to scrutiny.
Benefits
Farmers using regenerative practices say they’re able to increase
the amount and quality of topsoil on their land, which reduces the
need for soil inputs and water.[4] Rich topsoil can also produce
bigger yields because more nutrients are available for plants as
they grow.
Using as much farm waste as possible to create compost and other
natural fertilizers minimizes regenerative farms’ environmental
impact and further improves soil health. Healthy soil leads to
healthier people and animals and is more resistant to damage from
both droughts and floods.
Governments and institutions concerned about climate change point to
crop rotation and cover cropping as a way to reduce the effects of
greenhouse gas emissions over time. These two practices can help
sequester carbon in the soil, leaving less in the atmosphere.
Downsides
The biggest argument against regenerative agriculture focuses on how
effective it actually is at combating carbon emissions. Other
criticisms include:[5]
Regenerative agriculture is one among many solutions in the quest to
improve human and planetary health.
Implementation
Getting a regenerative farm off the ground requires creativity and a
willingness to learn. But as more governments and large companies
begin to promote the practice, more resources become available to
farmers interested in changing their approach to growing food.
To answer the critics’ skepticism surrounding carbon sequestration
and food production, there would need to be a widespread commitment
among farmers to stick with regenerative agriculture in the long
term. Just like conventional agriculture didn’t degrade the
environment overnight, rebuilding soil and improving crop yields
through regenerative practices will take time.
Financial support, government incentives, and educational
initiatives, as well as improved technologies and farming equipment
designed to support large-scale regenerative farms, can help bring
regenerative agriculture into the mainstream.[7]
Regenerative Farming: The Big Picture
Regenerative agriculture is one among many solutions in the quest to
improve human and planetary health. When used alongside initiatives
aimed at shortening supply chains and encouraging local food
production, regenerative practices can increase access to fresh,
nutritious food and contribute to a more secure food system.[8]
Businesses, restaurants, and institutions can also benefit from
collaborating with regenerative farms to use fresh, local produce in
the products they create and the meals they serve. This gives more
people the opportunity to enjoy whole plant foods at school, at
work, and when dining out.
While it does take time to transition from conventional farming to
regenerative agriculture, the goal isn’t out of reach. Farmers given
the right support and education can move away from dependence on
industrial practices and embrace methods of growing food that reduce
carbon emissions, boost soil, and support healthier communities.
References