Some racing fans said Saturday that the small crowd "concerned them" as it relates to the future of horse racing. The industry has downsized for years—nationally, more than 40 tracks have closed since 2000—and a number of publicized equine deaths recently has cast a shadow over the sport.
Beyond the obvious sadness involved, animal activism can be, to say
the least, extremely frustrating work. Change, while it does happen,
never comes quite fast enough. But I’m here to say that on this
issue, while we obviously still have to kill the subsidies, in the
war for hearts and minds (which must come first), we are winning. No
question about it.
One need not follow horseracing (or this site) to know that the
killing, which I remind is inherent to the industry, has been
national news for almost a month now, even more so than it was
during the Santa Anita spring of 2019. Literally a day has not gone
by since the week of the Derby without a mainstream media piece on
dead horses. Now, as expected the coverage is not always ideal. For
example, in this PBS News Weekend segment, although our data is
mentioned, the AP “journalist” who is interviewed reveals herself as
not only ignorant – which, to my mind, is unforgivable in her
profession – but, in fact, to be a simple shill for the racing
industry. Still, the cruelty and killing has been squarely in the
national conversation. And that’s good.
Relatedly, there’s this. A Baltimore Sun piece – “Even with Bruno
Mars boost, attendance lagged far behind pre-pandemic turnout” – in
the aftermath of Saturday’s Preakness notes the following: “1/ST
Racing, owners of Pimlico Race Course and the Maryland Jockey Club,
said Sunday in a news release that a combined 65,000 people attended
Friday, which was Black-Eyed Susan Day, and Saturday. By comparison,
roughly 182,000 attended the events over two days in 2019, meaning
turnout this year was a little more than a third of the total for
the last Preakness before the pandemic.”
2019 attendance: 182,000
2023 attendance: 65,000
The article continued:
“Some racing fans said Saturday that the small crowd concerned them
as it relates to the future of horse racing. The industry has
downsized for years — nationally, more than 40 tracks have closed
since 2000 [this stat, by the way, comes from Horseracing Wrongs] —
and a number of equine deaths recently has cast a shadow over the
sport. A 3-year-old colt, Havnameltdown, broke down Saturday during
the day’s sixth race with an injured leg. Black screens were brought
onto the track to conceal the horse from the crowd, and he was
euthanized as dance music continued to blast from the infield.”
And it’s probably even worse for the industry, for as the article
points out, most of the younger people were there just to see Bruno
Mars. When you have to resort to gimmicks, you know you’re in
trouble. Finally, while the article does note that the handle (total
amount wagered) was only slightly down from last year, it is in fact
down significantly from 15 years ago (when adjusted for inflation).
All this is to say, progress.