Horse racing is propped up by tax dollars from casinos that have nothing to do with what happens on the track or at the betting windows. Although the sport loses public interest with each passing year, at least 24 states, almost three-quarters of those with racing, directly subsidize it with public funds.
In February of last year, Sharon Ward listened intently as her
former boss, Pennsylvania Democratic Governor Tom Wolf, outlined his
spending priorities in his 2020 budget address. Halfway through, she
sat up as Wolf proposed a “historic” $200 million investment in
tuition for 25,000 students at Pennsylvania’s state universities.
They’d be paid for, Wolf said, “by repurposing existing tax dollars
that are right now flowing into the Horse Racing Development Fund.”
The fact that horse racing receives this much public assistance in a
single state was news to many outside the sport. Not to Ward,
though, a policy expert who’d led Wolf’s budget office in 2015. She
knew the industry’s Race Horse Development Fund existed, which, she
says, “is more than you can say for most people—including most
people in the legislature.” But now she was about to learn the full
scope of that subsidy and just how it was spent.
Wolf’s plan would still leave $40 million annually for racing. But
it’d be a big cut: Since 2004, when Pennsylvania legalized slot
machines at racetracks, up to 12 percent of slot revenues, or almost
$3 billion, has gone into the fund, most of which was then paid out
as race purses.
Ward, 63, was asked by Susan Spicka, the executive director of
Education Voters of Pennsylvania, a group that advocates for public
schools, to write about the Race Horse Development Fund. A former
schoolteacher, Spicka had ploughed a lonely furrow for years
campaigning for moving money out of racehorse welfare and into
education. She now saw an opportunity to reach a larger audience,
and she knew there was nobody better than Ward at piecing together
the state’s finances. But Spicka didn’t realize Ward already knew
her way around a racetrack.
“I’m probably one of the few mothers in America who taught all three
of her children how to read the Racing Form,” Ward says.
“The more I got into it, the more shocked I became,” Ward told me.
“This is an industry that is completely hidden from public view.
They’ve got a direct cash pipeline and they don’t want anybody to
know about it.”
It’s a story rarely told outside the racing industry, and
understandably so: Horse racing is propped up by tax dollars from
casinos that have nothing to do with what happens on the track or at
the betting windows. Although the sport loses public interest with
each passing year, at least 24 states, almost three-quarters of
those with racing, directly subsidize it with public funds. Based on
publicly available information and statistical analysis, the total
is likely close to $1 billion annually.
It is a safe bet that wherever there is horse racing, taxpayer
dollars are used to keep it afloat, to one degree or another, with
subsidies such as the above when the State should be spending that
money for education and programs that can assist the citizens of
that State.
How can this be? Who are these people who are able to get this done?
Shame, shame and more shame on the politicians, lobbyists and
elected officials who keep this sort of charade going.
In the meantime, what about that raid on the backside of Parx Racing
carried out by the Pennsylvania State Horse Racing Commission which
revealed “a significant amount of contraband.” Taxpayer dollars are
used to keep that place afloat?
So we come back to where we started — with the title of this
article: “Slots are not saving racing. Neither are billions in
public subsidies. Can anything?”
Racing’s demise cannot come quickly enough for the horses, or for
us.