Just because a prosecutor loses a case doesn’t mean the law should be changed.
On January 31, Utah’s largest newspaper, The Salt Lake Tribune, published an op-ed written by R. Lynn Carlson, one of the jurors from the groundbreaking Smithfield Trial where open rescue activists were acquitted for the first time in history.
Lynn defends the
acquittal of animal rescuers and criticizes the reaction of Utah
legislators who have introduced an anti-rescue bill, House Bill 114,
in direct response to the outcome of the Smithfield Trial ["R. Lynn Carlson: Bill would undermine Utah's jury system"].
If it passes, HB 114 will change the nature of Utah’s theft statute
to prevent any defendant from raising a defense that their actions
were necessary to save an animal who is “sick, dying, or a liability
to the owner.”
This bill goes against the will of ordinary Utahns. Instead of
taking action to end the animal cruelty that DxE exposed at
Smithfield, the Utah legislature is doubling down on factory farm
owners’ right to leave sick and suffering animals to die.
Lynn says it well in his op-ed:
“This bill is a reckless and impulsive reaction by politicians who are clearly re-writing the law to appease Smithfield and the powerful agriculture lobby in Utah. The people of Utah should speak up against HB 114 and protect the integrity of our criminal justice system."