Dear Wall Street Journal: Anti-Vegan Propaganda Isn’t Just Wrong, It’s Dangerous
An Meat and Dairy Article from All-Creatures.org
The beef industry paid for a major ad to be placed in
Wall Street Journal. The ad claimed that meat is not damaging the planet.
Image from pixnio.com
The beef industry paid for a major ad to be placed in Wall Street
Journal. The ad claimed that meat is not damaging the planet
Last week, major international newspaper Wall Street Journal (WSJ)
published a full-page ad that praised the sustainability of the meat
industry. The ad also took a swing at the vegan movement, claiming
that if every American stopped eating animal products, greenhouse
gas emissions would only fall by 0.36 to 2 percent globally.
The Beef Check Off Advert in Wall Street Journal
The ad was, unsurprisingly, paid for by the Beef Checkoff, a program
designed to increase the consumption of beef.
The Center For Consumer Freedom (CCF) also worked on the ad. The CCF
– which has meat industry representatives on its advisory board –
runs campaigns attacking environmental protection groups and animal
rights organizations.
An anti plant-based propoganda video created by the Center For
Consumer Freedom, designed to reduce confidence in plant-based
meats.
“Beef’s environmental footprint may drive headlines, but the truth
is, eliminating beef is not a realistic or impactful solution for
climate change,” part of the ad reads. It carries on, saying that
raising cattle actually helps protect the planet.
But the claims lack meaningful evidence. And while the meat
industry’s editorial tantrums are not a new concept (see the similar
ads it placed in WSJ and The New York Times in 2019), they are
arguably more damaging than ever.
The global climate emergency is accelerating at an unprecedented
rate. We cannot afford to be spreading misinformation on such a
major scale (WSJ distributes around 2,834,000 copies a day).
So, here is an open letter to the publication, urging it to correct
the advertisement. You can read the full version below.
Dear Wall Street Journal, Dear Mr. Murray,
We were forwarded the attached advertisement with manipulated
science displayed in the Wall Street Journal on August 14, and we
would like to ask your help in rectifying the advertisement, as
continuing to promote beef consumption will cause tremendous damage
to our planet.
This advertisement is based on questionable data. It is not
credible, and contradicts data supported by the international
scientific reports and data from institutions such as the FAO, UNEP,
and the IPCC (leading international climate data sources).
The Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN, for example, says:
Total emissions from global livestock: 7.1 Gigatonnes of Co2-equiv
per year, representing 14.5 percent of all anthropogenic GHG
emissions … Cattle (raised for both beef and milk, as well as for
inedible outputs like manure and draft power) are the animal species
responsible for the most emissions, representing about 65 percent of
the livestock sector’s emissions … feed production and processing
(this includes land use change) and enteric fermentation from
ruminants are the two main sources of emissions, representing 45 and
39 percent of total emissions, respectively.
The US figures for livestock production are lower but typically do
not include any emissions caused elsewhere, for example for the
production of livestock feed, usually in South America, which are a
key driver of greenhouse gas emissions.
Furthermore:
Switching to a plant-based diet could reduce your food-related
emissions by up to 50 percent.
We just launched Diet Change Not Climate Change representing the
facts accurately.
We would prefer the Wall Street Journal to disassociate itself from
the advertisement, and a confirmation it will not advertise such
misleading data again.
We would be grateful if this message could be forwarded to the
correct department within the Wall Street Journal.
Yours truly,
Jasmijn de Boo,
Vice President, ProVeg International
Robbie Lockie,
Director of Plant Based News
Return to
Meat and Dairy Articles
Read more at
Environmental Articles