You argued: "As you know, many vegetable farms kill small rodents and
other mammals in order to obtain vegetables. Funny, I haven't heard you
complain about that. Consistent ethics?" You're incorrect, I've stated
elsewhere:
"Raising animals for food, even raising animals for animal by-products like
milk and eggs, means wasting valuable acreage, because the animals
themselves are raised on plant food! If we eat lower on the food chain,
fewer resources are required to feed everyone, which means less agricultural
acreage, etc., which means fewer rodents and insects are killed when fields
are ploughed for farming, etc. Fewer plants are killed, too. If you carry
this argument to its logical conclusion, a vegan diet is the least violent,
because it requires one-third less acreage than a lacto-ovo-vegetarian diet,
and twenty times less acreage than a meat-centered diet."
I've also said elsewhere that a return to organic farming is a direct
response to the moral issue of unnecessarily killing insects. You also
argued: "Of course, if we buy clothing or appliances and we find they
mistreat their employees, then we should not buy their products either...
You would have more credibility if you also called for the ethical treatment
of human beings when obtaining clothing and other articles."
I agree with you. You're taking note of what past president of Feminists For
Life and vegan psychology professor Rachel MacNair refers to as "movement
connections" -- animal activists finding common ground or forging an
alliance with related causes or related movements. As early as 1975, Peter
Singer wrote in Animal Liberation: "The environmental
movement...has led people to think about our relations with other animals
that seemed impossible only a decade ago. To date, environmentalists have
been more concerned with wildlife and endangered species than with animals
in general, but it is not too big a jump from the thought that it is wrong
to treat whales as giant vessels filled with oil and blubber to the thought
that it is wrong to treat (animals) as machines for converting grains to
flesh."
In the late 1980s, Vegetarian Times reported animal activists were
linking the animal rights movement to the civil rights movement and the
women's movement. In 1994, my friend Ruth Enero, a Catholic peace activist
whom I very much respect, attended an animal rights festival in Los Gatos,
California. Ruth told me she attended some of the lectures and heard animal
activists discussing forging an alliance with activists involved with the
plight of migrant farm workers. Lauren Ornelas of the Food Empowerment
Project, based here in the San Francisco Bay Area, campaigns on behalf of
children of migrant farm workers and is involved with the animal rights
movement forging an alliance with the fair trade movement, which opposes
child labor, sweatshops, etc. Animals are like children. It isn't too big a
jump from the thought that it's wrong to purchase products involving child
labor and sweatshops to the thought that it is wrong to purchase products
which involve the suffering and death of animals. Recently, Lauren Ornelas
and her organization the Food Empowerment Project have been siding with
striking employees at Amy's vegetarian fast food restaurant as well.
Go on to: Ideas of the future
Return to: Articles
Return to: The Writings of Vasu Murti