Regarding relativism, study results imply that individuals who believe in a universal governing moral principle are more likely to have a higher awareness of animal protection, and, therefore, a lower acceptability toward harming animals.
Animals—specifically, beliefs and attitudes towards them—have a
central role within the field of human-animal relationships, animal
welfare, ecological belief and sustainability. However, there are
limited studies on the relationship between religious belief and
public attitudes toward animals, and the role religion plays
regarding attitudes towards animals is as yet still unclear.
This study explores the relationship between individuals’
acceptability for harming animals as one representation of
ecological concern (measured using Animal Issue Scale (AIS)) and
their religious belief (measured using Religious Orientation Scale
(ROS)) and ethical ideology (measured using Ethical Position
Questionnaire (EPQ)). The study surveyed 929 Muslim teachers and
school staff in East Java, Indonesia.
The present study highlights the significant relationship between
religious orientation and relativism to AIS. Regarding relativism,
the results imply that individuals who believe in a universal
governing moral principle are more likely to have a higher awareness
of animal protection, and, therefore, a lower acceptability toward
harming animals. For religious orientation, results imply that
individuals who have deep personal religious belief and commitment
to their religion would likely have a low acceptability for harming
animals. However, when people have extra ulterior motives of for
pursuing social gain, status, affiliation, or membership with their
religious activities participation, it would be more likely that
they have a higher acceptability for harming animals. Thus, the
present study not only supports previous findings, but also
contributes to addressing religious orientation as a significant
variable closely related to attitudes towards animals.
In addition, the present study extends the potential for animal
protection awareness to reach broader platforms, for example, in the
case where religious values and institutions could serve as
motivational platforms. Finally, as this is the first paper to
investigate how both religious orientation and ethical ideology
relates to animal protection, other research focusing on specific
animals such as companion animals, carnivores, or animals important
to maintaining ecosystem health for environmental sustainability,
may be introduced as focal points in religious studies and related
platforms.