The growth of alternative proteins from companies like Impossible Foods and Beyond Meat, new research into genetically modified meat products, and increased attention to the ethical implications of industrial farming have forced scholars of kashrut and halal to reevaluate their interpretations of religious dietary restrictions.
Graphic by Alex Hinton | Source Images: ProVectors/Kateryna
Novokhatnia/RobinOlimb/PhonlamaiPhoto/gilaxia/iStock
There’s a classic joke in Judaism that for every Jew there are two
opinions. Meant to signify a general lack of agreement about the
application of religious laws (as well as our love of
argumentation), the joke is based in truth—namely that in Judaism
there is no clear answer to many of the tradition’s recurring
questions. The same is true in Islam, where scholars have spent
centuries negotiating the application of religious principles in
modernity.
Nowhere is this lack of agreement felt more clearly than in ongoing
debates about religious dietary restrictions. The growth of
alternative proteins from companies like Impossible Foods and Beyond
Meat, new research into genetically modified meat products, and
increased attention to the ethical implications of industrial
farming have forced scholars of kashrut and halal to reevaluate
their interpretations of religious dietary restrictions. Caught up
in a web of certifying organizations and economically-motivated
food-tech companies, some religious Jews and Muslims have found that
their consumption practices are increasingly divorced from the
religious laws and social contexts that formed the basis of Jewish
and Muslim foodways.
....
Please read the ENTIRE ARTICLE HERE (PDF).