We’ve come a long way, and we do indeed have momentum, but I fear we could see a repeat of the nineties, with fur coming back strong, especially if the industry has the FBI and DOJ watching their back. Activists need to keep the pressure on fur to make sure that it stays away for good.
There has been a lot of great news about animal-based fur in the last
couple of years. Not only did California just become the first state in the
U.S. to ban the production and sale of fur, but it banned fur trapping. New
York City is also considering a ban on fur sales. Macy’s and Bloomingdale’s
made headlines this month when they announced they would no longer sell fur,
adding their names to an ever-growing list of department stores, designers,
and fashion houses—including Burberry, Calvin Klein, Georgio Armani, Gucci,
Michael Kors, Prada, and Ralph Lauren—that have gone fur-free. In 2018,
designer Donatella Versace, long known for her support of fur, said, “Fur? I
am out of that. I don’t want to kill animals to make fashion. It doesn’t
feel right.” Meanwhile, Norway and Slovakia recently said they are closing
their fur farms, joining more than a dozen other countries in Europe that
are banning fur farming and removing an important link in the supply chain.
Even London Fashion Week ditched animal fur last year.
With all these advancements for fur-bearing animals, it’s tempting to think
fur is finally dead. Sadly, it’s not, and activists can’t make the mistake
of believing we’ve crossed the finish line—yet.
Just as many people are surprised to learn that whales are still being
killed—they ask, “Didn’t that end in the eighties?”—activists have not put
the final nail into fur’s coffin. After anti-fur campaigns in the sixties,
seventies, and eighties, it looked like the industry was on its last breath,
but fur made a comeback in the 1990s, buoyed by newly affluent buyers in
China, South Korea, and Russia. By 2004, the global fur industry was worth
$11.7 billion. Now, according to the International Fur Federation, the
industry is valued at $40 billion. In the U.S., fur hit a 17-year high last
year with $531 million in sales, up from $337 million in 2014.
So what happened? Part of the answer is that the fur industry found new
markets for its cruel products. They began targeting the next generation of
consumers with dyes to create a “modern” look. They hired new celebrity
models. They looked beyond coats, gloves, and hats and used fur to adorn
household items like furniture as well as shoes, keychains, pillows,
scarves, and cat toys. And they created thinner fur garments that could be
worn in warmer climates.
They also got into design schools, subsidizing the fur used by students—even
in high school.
One of their biggest efforts has been the greenwashing of fur. As I discuss
in Bleating Hearts, to divert consumer attention away from animal cruelty,
the industry now touts fur as the ultimate “eco fashion,” such as in the Fur
Council of Canada’s print ad featuring a model decked out in fur beneath the
headline “Environmental Activist.” The ad copy explains that “wearing fur
also helps protect nature, by supporting people who live on the land.” By
“people” they mean trappers, who “depend on nature for their livelihoods.”
Absent from the ad is any mention of the millions of “trash” animals
trappers routinely kill while they are being “stewards of Earth.”
Indeed, the Council would have us believe that fur garments and accessories
only come from animals caught in the wild. “In nature, each plant and animal
species generally produces more offspring than the land can support to
maturity,” reads the their website. “Like other species, we live by making
use of part of this surplus that nature creates.” This is a preposterous
lie, as far as the fur industry is concerned, because the majority of fur
used in the trade is produced in farms from animals specifically bred for
this purpose, and they know it. (Canada’s market for fur-farmed animals is
three times the size of its wild-fur market.) A 2011 study on the
environmental effects of mink-fur production found that it takes 11 animals
to produce 1 kilogram of fur, and that the industry has a higher impact than
other textiles in 17 of 18 measurement categories, including global warming
and toxic emissions.
But fur’s carefully orchestrated comeback goes even deeper.
“The animal rights movement once before underestimated the fur industry and
prematurely celebrated its supposed imminent demise,” says Ryan Shapiro,
PhD, a longtime animal rights activist and now executive director of the
transparency organization Property of the People. “Not only did this allow
the industry to rebound, but the fur industry is just as committed to
eliminating the animal rights movement as we are to ending it.” Ryan notes
that documents he has obtained from one of his many Freedom of Information
Act lawsuits against the FBI reveal it was the resurgent fur industry in the
late-1990s that secretly met with the Department of Justice (DOJ) to
coordinate a federal assault on the animal rights movement. “It was the fur
industry that pushed the DOJ and FBI to target the animal rights movement as
a terrorist threat. It was the fur industry that gave the DOJ and FBI lists
of activists and organizations it wanted neutralized. And it was ultimately
this lobbying behind closed doors by the fur industry that gave rise to
today’s Green Scare. The fur industry poses a double menace, both to animals
and the movement for their liberation. We cannot rest until this vicious
industry is entirely eradicated and consigned to the dustbin of history.”
Not everyone agrees that recent victories mean activists might shift their
efforts to other campaigns.
Camilla Fox, executive director of Project Coyote in California, says she
doesn’t believe the state’s new anti-fur legislation will slow down
activists. “I think if anything success like this re-inspires people to stay
engaged and continue pursuit of related issues—especially if they’re tapped
into email alerts from organizations like ours to stay apprised of what
other issues need attention.”
And Camille Labchuk, executive director of the animal law organization
Animal Justice and one of Canada’s leading animal rights lawyers, told The
Star that the recent fur-related bans in the U.S. and Europe have created an
“unstoppable momentum” that she hopes will extend to her country, where
activists continue to take action against outdoor clothing company Canada
Goose for its use of down and coyote fur.
I hope they’re right. We’ve come a long way, and we do indeed have momentum,
but I fear we could see a repeat of the nineties, with fur coming back
strong, especially if the industry has the FBI and DOJ watching their back.
“Activists need to keep the pressure on fur to make sure that it stays away
for good,” says animal rights advocate lauren Ornelas, who attended her
first anti-fur protest in 1987. “We just need to keep reinforcing the fact
that non-human animals are not ours to exploit.”
What You Can Do
Looking to get involved but don’t know where to begin? One place you can
start is the Fur Free Alliance, an international coalition of animal
protection organizations working to end the deprivation and cruelty suffered
by fur-bearing animals both in wild trapping and industrial fur farming.
They offer a number of fact sheets that you can use in your activism, which
can be as simple as talking to family and friends about this issue, sharing
information on social media, or signing petitions like this one, this one,
or this one. You can write a letter to the editor of your local newspaper.
Or you can participate in a Fur Free Friday protest on November 29 (do an
online search for an event in your area). You can even speak directly to
retailers that still sell fur and tell them you won’t shop there until they
remove the cruelty from their racks. And you can contact fashion brands that
use fur in their designs and tell them you won’t support them. Of course,
you can also contact companies that have ditched fur and thank them!
Whatever steps you take, large or small, each one makes a difference for the
animals.